Some digital music at Amazon.com: Amazon.com
Widgets
Index of Litigation
Documents Referred to in "Recording
Industry vs. The People" Ray Beckerman, P.C. Note: email me and let me know,
and I'll upload the document to my firm's site where it will be
accessible again. Thanks. ~ R.B. )
Updated through
05/17/13 Recording
Industry vs. The People )
TABLE OF CASES (Alphabetical by case
name) ABC v. Aero (New York, NY) Achte/Nuente v. Does 1-4577 (DC) AF Holdings v. Rogers (San Diego, CA) AF Holdings v. Trinh (San Fracisco, CA) Andersen v. Atlantic (Oregon) Arista Records v. Does 1-4 (New Haven, CT) Arista v. Does 1-6 (Connecticut) Arista Records v. Does 1-6 -
Lincoln, Nebraska (Lincoln, Nebraska) Arista v. Does 1-7 (Huntington, WV) Arista v. Does 1-9 (Denver, CO) Arista v. Does 1-9 (Columbus, OH) Arista v. Does 1-11 (Cleveland)
(Cleveland, OH) Arista v. Does 1-11 (Oklahoma City)
(Oklahoma City, OK) Arista v. Does 1-15 (Columbus, OH) Arista v. Does 1-16 (Albany, NY) Arista v. Does 1-17 (Portland, OR) Arista v. Does 1-19 (District of Columbia) Arista v. Does 1-21 (D. Mass.) Arista v. Does 1-22 (Providence, RI) Arista v. Does 1-27 (Portland, ME) Arista v. Does 1-34 (Raleigh, NC) Arista v. Escape Media (New York, NY) Arista v. Finkelstein (Brooklyn, NY) Arista v. Frawley (Albany, NY) Arista v. Greubel (Fort Worth, TX) Arista v. Lime Wire (New York, NY)(RIAA
case against Lime Wire) Arista v. Tschirhart (San Antonio, TX) Arista v. Usenet (New York, NY) Associated Press v. Meltwater
(New York, NY) Atlantic v. Andersen(Portland, OR) Atlantic v. Anderson (Houston, TX) Atlantic v. Boggs (Corpus Christi, Texas) Atlantic v. Boyer (Tampa, FL) Atlantic v. Brennan (New Haven, CT) Atlantic v. Dangler (Rochester, NY) Atlantic v. DeMassi (Houston, TX) Atlantic v. Does 1-14 (Portland, ME) Atlantic v. Does 1-25(New York, NY) Atlantic v. Howell (Phoenix, AZ)(pro se) Atlantic v. Huggins(Brooklyn, NY) Atlantic v. Lenentine (Portland, ME) Atlantic v. Myers (Jackson, MS) Atlantic v. Njuguna (Charleston, SC) Atlantic v. Raleigh (Missouri) Atlantic v. Serrano (San Diego, CA) Atlantic v. Shutovsky (New York, NY) Atlantic Recording v. Williams
(Pittsburgh, PA) Atlantic v. Zuleta (Atlanta, GA) BMG v. Conklin (Pro se case in Houston,
TX) BMG v. Doe (Canada) BMG v. Doe 1 (Raleigh, NC) BMG v. Does (E. D. Pa. CV 04-650) BMG v. Does 1-10 (Raleigh, NC) BMG v. Does 1-11 (Portland, ME) BMG Music v. Does 1-14 (Greensboro, NC) BMG v. Gonzalez (USCA 7th Cir.) BMG v. Thao (Chicago, IL) Brownmark Films v. Comedy
Partners (USCA 7th Cir.) Capitol v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) Capitol v. Does 1-16 (D. New Mexico) Capitol v. Fanguiaire (Boston, MA) Capitol v. Foster (Oklahoma) Capitol v. Frye (Winston Salem, NC) Capitol v. Laude (Portland, ME) Capitol v. MP3Tunes (New York, NY) Capitol Records v. ReDigi Inc. (New York,
NY) Capitol Records v. Seeqpod (New York, NY) Capitol Records v. Sitaras (Brooklyn, NY) Capitol Records v. Straw (Boston, MA) Capitol v. Thomas (formerly Virgin v.
Thomas)(Duluth, MN) Capitol v. Video Egg (New York, NY) Capitol v. Weed (Phoenix, AZ) Cartoon Networks v. CSC Holdings (New York, NY) Case no. 162983070 v.
MediaSentry (Michigan) Central Michigan University v.
MediaSentry (Michigan) Chan v. Priority (Detroit, MI) Combat Zone v. Does 1-34 (New York, NY) Combat Zone v. Does 1-84 (Boston, MA) Digital Sins v. Does 1-27 (New York,
NY) Digital Sins v. Does 1-245 (New
York, NY) Discount Video Center v. Does 1-29
(Boston, MA) Dish Network v. ABC (New York, NY) Elektra v. Barker (New York, NY) Elektra v. Dennis (Jackson, MS) Elektra v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) Elektra v. Does 1-9 (Closed) Elektra v. Harless (Detroit, MI) Elektra v. Licata, Cincinnati, OH Elektra v. McCall (Minnesota) Elektra v. McDowell (Columbus, GA) Elektra v. O'Brien (C.D. CA) Elektra Entertainment Group v. Maphet
(Wichita, KS) Elektra v. Perez (Oregon) Elektra v. Santangelo (White Plains, NY) Elektra v. Santangelo II (White
Plains, NY) Elektra v. Schwartz (Brooklyn, NY) Elektra v. Torres (Brooklyn, NY) Elektra v. Werry (Providence, Rhode Island) Elektra v. Wilke (Chicago, IL) Elf-man LLC v. Does 1-57 (Portland, OR) Fairey v. Associated Press (New York, NY) FBT Productions v. Aftermath Records (Los
Angeles, CA) Flava v. Gunter (US Ct Appeals 7th Cir.) Fonovisa v. Alvarez (Abilene, TX) Fonovisa v. Does 1-9 (Pittsburgh, PA)
Fonovisa v. Does 1-41 (Austin, TX) Foundation v. UPC Nederland
(Netherlands, District Court of Utrecht) Giordano v. Romeo (Florida) Greenbaum v. Google (New York, NY) Hard Drive v. Does 1-90 (San Jose, CA) Ingenuity 13 v. Doe (Los Angeles, CA) In re BitTorrent Adult Film
Copyright Infringement Cases (Central Islip, NY) Interscope v. Does 1-100(New York, NY) Interscope v. Does 1-7 (Newport News,
VA) Interscope v. Does 1-40 (Tampa FL) Interscope v. Duty (Arizona) Interscope v. Kimmel (NDNY Binghamton
Divis.) Interscope v. Korb (Charleston, SC) Interscope v. Leadbetter (Seattle,
WA) Interscope Records v. Paul (Boston, MA) Interscope v. Rodriguez (San Diego,
CA) James v. UMG Recordings (San Francisco, CA) K-Beech v. Does 1-37 (Central Islip, NY) Kruger v. MediaSentry (Michigan Dept.
Labor & Economic Growth) Io v. Veoh (California) LaFace v. Does 1-5 (Kalamazoo, MI, and
Marquette, MI) LaFace v. Does 1-7(Michigan) LaFace v. Does 1-14 (Arizona) LaFace v. Does 1-17 (Boston, MA) LaFace v. Does 1-38 (Raleigh, NC) LaFace Records v. Griffin (Boston, MA) LaFace Records v. Maddox (Pittsburgh, PA)
(see also Fonovisa v. Does 1-9 )Lava v. Amurao (White Plains, NY) Lava v. Amurao II (White Plains, NY) Lenz v. Universal Music (San Jose, CA) Lewan v. Sharman (Chicago, IL)(class action
against Kazaa) Liberty Media v. Tabora (New York, NY) London-Sire Records v. Doe 1 (Boston, MA)
(See also Arista v. Does 1-21 (Boston, MA) ,
SONY BMG Music v. Tenenbaum (Boston, MA) )
Loud v. Does (New York, NY) Loud v. Sanchez (Tucson, AZ) Louis Vuitton v. Warner Bros. (New
York, NY) Malibu Media v. Does 1-5 (New York, NY) Malibu Media v. Does 1-5 /
12-2950 (New York, NY) Malibu Media v. Does 1-10 (White
Plains, NY) Malibu Media v. Does 1-11 (White
Plains, NY) Malibu Media v. Does 1-13 (Central
Islip, NY) Malibu Media v. Does 1-20 (Central
Islip, NY) Malibu Media v. Does 1-28 (Tampa,
FL) Malibu Media v. John Does 1-6
(Philadelphia, PA) Malibu Media v. John Does 1-10
(Newark, NJ) Malibu Media v. John Does 1-14
(Fort Wayne, IN) Malibu Media v. John Does 1-19
(Trenton, NJ) Maverick v. Becker (Brooklyn, NY) Maverick v. Chowdhury (Brooklyn, NY) Maverick v. Goldshteyn (Brooklyn, NY) Maverick v. Harper (San Antonio, TX) Media Products v. Does 1-26 (New
York, NY) Media Products v. Does 1-120
(Springfield, MA) MegaUpload v. UMG (San Jose, CA) MGM v. Grokster (C.D. California) Mick Haig Productions v. Does 1-670
(Dallas, TX) Mostly Memories v. For Your Ease (7th
Circuit) Motown v. DePietro (Pro Se Case)
(Philadelphia, PA) Motown Record v. Doe (Los Angeles, CA) Motown v. Does 1-99 (New York, NY) Motown Record Company v. Kovalcik
(Philadelphia, PA) Motown v. Liggins (M.D. Alabama) Motown v. Lisberg, (Los Angeles, CA Motown v. Nelson (Detroit, MI) New Sensations v. Does 1-83
(Boston, MA) New Sensations v. Does 1-201
(Boston, MA) New Sensations v. Does 1-1474
(San Francisco, CA) Nieman v. VersusLaw (US Ct app7th Cir.) Patrick Collins Inc. v. Doe 1 (Central
Islip, NY) (see also "In re Bit
Torrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement Cases (Central Islip, NY)") Patrick Collins v. Does 1-45 (New
York, NY) Patrick Collins v. John Does
1-6 (Washington, DC) Patrick Collins Inc v John Does
1-11 (Central Islip, NY) Perfect 10 v. Tumblr (New York, NY) Priority v. Beer (Columbus, GA) Priority v. Chan (Detroit, MI)(Closed) Priority v. Chan II (Detroit, MI) Priority v. Vines (Indianapolis, IN) Realview v. 20/20 (Boston, MA) RIAA v. Atkinson (Boston, MA) RIAA v. Buckley (Boston, MA) RIAA v. Viola (Boston, MA) Robertson v. MediaSentry (Raleigh,
NC) Rogers v. Capitol Records Safety Point Products v. Does 1-14
(Cleveland, OH) SONY v. Arellanes (Sherman, TX) SONY v. Cloud (Philadelphia, PA) SONY v. Crain (Beaumont, TX) SONY v. DeMaria (Charleston, SC) SONY v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) SONY v. Does 1-5 (Los Angeles, CA) SONY BMG Music v. Does 1-10 (Fresno, CA) SONY v. Does 1-40(New York, NY) SDNY
04cv473(Closed) SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Fillo (NH) SONY Music Entertainment v. Kruger (Kalamazoo,
MI) SONY v. Merchant (California) SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Moursy
(Raleigh, NC) SONY BMG Music V. Reese (Houston, TX) SONY BMG Music v. Scimeca (Newark, NJ)
(Closed) SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Simms (Atlanta,
GA) SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Stade
(Rochester, NY) SONY BMG Music v. Tenenbaum (Boston, MA) Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. Nguyen (Tampa, FL) Third Degree Films v. Does 1-47
(Boston, MA) Third Degree Films v. John Does
1-110 (Newark, NJ) Tiffany v. eBay (New York, NY) UMG Recordings v. Briggs (Boston, MA) UMG Recordings v. Adams (Omaha, NE) UMG Recording v. Ceesay (Maryland) UMG v. Del Cid (Tampa, FL) UMG Recordings v. English (Cleveland, OH) UMG v. Greubel (Forth Worth, TX) UMG v. Guin (Brooklyn, NY) UMG Recordings v. Heard (Birmingham, Alabama) UMG Recordings v. Hernandez (Brooklyn, NY) UMG Recordings v. Hightower (Houston, TX) UMG Recordings v. Hummer Winblad (San
Francisco, CA)(Case Against Napster Investors) UMG Recordings v. Johnson (Kansas City, KS) UMG Recordings v. Landau (Utica, NY) UMG Recordings v. Lanzoni (Houston, TX) UMG Recordings v. Lindor (Brooklyn, NY) UMG Recordings v. Roy (New Hampshire) UMG Recordings v. Veoh Networks (Los Angeles, CA) Universal v. Hogan (San Diego,
CA)(MPAA case) Viacom v. YouTube (New York, NY) Virgin v. Does 1-33 (Knoxville, TN) Virgin v. Marson (Central Dist. California,
Western Divis.) Virgin v. Morgan (Pensacola, FL) Virgin Records v. Thomas (Duluth, MN) Virgin Records v. Thompson (W.D. TX) Virgin Records v. Young (Brooklyn, NY) Voltage Pictures v. Does 1-198
(Portland, OR) Warner v. Attal (Brooklyn, NY) Warner v. Berry (New York, NY) Warner v. Cassin (White Plains, NY) Warner v. DeWitt (N.D. Ill. Eastern Div.) Warner v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) Warner v. Does 1-149 (New York, NY) Warner v. Lewis (Lafayette, LA) Warner v. Maravilla (C.D. California) Warner v. Paladuk (E. D. Michigan) Warner v. Payne (Waco, TX) Warner Bros. Entertainment v. RDR Books (New
York, NY) Warner v. Scantlebury E.D. Michigan,
Southern Division) Warner v. Stubbs (Oklahoma City, OK) Warner Bros. Records v. Weiner (Boston, MA) WNET v. Aereo (New York, NY) WPIX v. ivi (US Ct App 2nd Circuit) Zomba v. Does 1-11 (Boston, MA) Zomba v. Does 1-15 (Kentucky)
ABC v. Aero (New York, NY) July
11, 2012, opinion
Achte/Nuente v. Does
1-4577 (DC) Order
partially granting motion for extension of time to make service
AF Holdings v. Rogers (San
Diego, CA) January
29, 2013, Order Partially Granting Motion to Dismiss for Failure to
State a Claim, Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge Defendant's
memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss
AF Holdings v. Trinh (San
Francisco, CA) November
9, 2012, Order, directing plaintiff to file undertaking in amount of
$47,500, Hon. Charles R. Breyer, District Judge February
25, 2013, Order, granting motion to dismiss with prejudice, Hon.
Charles R. Breyer, District Judge Declaration
in support of motion for attorneys fees
Andersen v. Atlantic
(Oregon) Complaint* Amended
complaint* Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss* February
19, 2008, Order Dismissing Complaint, Granting Leave to Replead* Unofficial
transcript of February 13, 2008, oral argument* Second
Amended Complaint* Plaintiff's
Status Report* Third
Amended Complaint* Amended
complaint* Status
report* Motion
to commence immediate discovery* Answer
of RIAA, Settlement Support Center LLC, and record companies* Answer
of SafeNet a/k/a MediaSentry* Notification
that plaintiff's brief for class action certification has been sealed Defendant's
brief in support of motion for judgment on the pleadings Statement
of Material Facts in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Memorandum
of Law Jacobson
Declaration Connelly
Declaration Oppenheim
declaration Coggon
declaration Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in opposition to class certification
Arista Records v. Does 1-4 December
9, 2008, decision, granting ex parte discovery motion, and sua
sponte severing as to all John Does other than John Doe #1
(Also at : 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99791)
Arista v. Does 1-6)(Connecticut) April
24, 2008, Judgment dismissing complaint for failure to prosecute
Arista Records v. Does
1-6 - Lincoln, Nebraska (Lincoln, Nebraska) Order
denying motion for discovery Order
granting motion for discovery Report
and Recommendation recommending dismissal "without prejudice"
Arista v. Does 1-7
(Huntington, WV) Moving
affidavit* Moving
memorandum of law* RIAA
opposition* Movant's
reply memo* RIAA
surreply memo* April
14, 2008, Order of Magistrate Judge denying motion to quash*
Arista v. Does 1-9 (Denver, CO) Ex
Parte Order dated April 4, 2007 (Granting Ex Parte Order, But Declining
to Rule that Court Order is Unnecessary)*
Arista v. Does 1-9
(Columbus, Ohio) John
Doe #1 Motion to Quash* John
Doe #9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Vacate Order, Quash Subpoena* John
Doe #9 Motion for Stay* John
Doe #5 Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Vacate Order, Quash Subpoena* John
Doe #5 Motion for Stay* November
29, 2007, Order Granting Stay of Subpoena* RIAA
Opposition Memo* Defendants'
Reply Memo* April
18, 2008, Order and Opinion of Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel,
dismissing complaint as to John Does 2-9* Motion
for reconsideration* Motion
for stay* July
29, 2008, Decision affirming Magistrate Judge's rulings Notice
of Dismissal Without Prejudice
Arista v. Does 1-11
(Cleveland) (Cleveland, Ohio) Motion
to Quash* RIAA
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Quash* Reply
Papers in Support of Motion to Vacate and Quash* November
3, 2008, Decision
Arista v. Does 1-11 (Oklahoma
City) (Oklahoma City, OK) Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Vacate* Expert
Witness Declaration of Jayson Street* Attachment
1 -- November 2004 Order in Fonovisa v. Does* RIAA
Motion for 2-week extension of time* Defendants'
opposition to RIAA Motion for 2-week extension of time* Declaration
of Moshe D. Rothman in Opposition to Motion to Quash* RIAA
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Quash* Exhibit
3 List of Ex Parte Orders* Defendants'
Motion to Strike Pleadings* RIAA's
Opposition to Motion to Strike* Defendants'
Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Strike RIAA's Pleadings* November
14, 2007, Order Denying Motion to Vacate and to Quash* RIAA
Application for order to show cause and conference* Exhibit
(January 31, 2008, letter of Marilyn Barringer-Thomson* February
12, 2008, Order to Show Cause*
Arista v. Does 1-15
(Columbus, OH) Complaint
in Arista v. Does 1-15* Complaint
in Capitol v. Does 1-10* May
23, 2007, Letter of Joseph Hazelbaker to Ohio University* Motion
to quash* November
5, 2007, Decision of Magistrate Judge Denying Motion to quash*
Arista v. Does 1-16 (Albany,
NY) Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Defendants'
Amended Memorandum of Law Plaintiffs'
Opposition Defendants'
reply memorandum of law Supplemental
Declaration of Richard A. Altman February
18, 2009, Decision of Magistrate Judge Declaration
of Richard A. Altman and Objections Decision
affirming Magistrate Judge's decision Declaration
in support of motion for stay March
10, 2009, order granting interim stay Plaintiffs'
memorandum in opposition to motion for stay pending appeal Defendant's
reply memorandum in support of motion for stay pending appeal Defendant's
motion to extend stay Opposition to motion for extension of briefing schedule April
23, 2009, Order of 2nd Circuit, granting stay pending appeal Brief
of Appellant Appellees'
Brief Reply
Brief of Appellant Decision,
US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
Arista v. Does 1-17
(Portland, OR) University
of Oregon's Motion to Quash* University
of Oregon's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Quash* RIAA's
opposition to motion to quash* Oregon
Attorney General Reply Memorandum of Law* Oregon
Attorney General Reply Affidavit* Exhibit
F (Excerpt from Doug Jacobson deposition transcript in UMG v. Lindor)* Exhibit
H (Draft Interrogatories)* Surreply
Memo in Opposition to Oregon Attorney General's Request for Discovery* Motion
to Strike Oregon Attorney General's Request for Discovery* Notice
of supplemental authority* September
25, 2008, decision granting motion to quash, but authorizing second
subpoena Notice
of Dismissal
Arista v. Does 1-19 (District
of Columbia) October
20, 2007, Docket Report, Arista v. Does 1-19, District of Columbia* Motion
by John Doe #3 to Vacate Ex Parte Order, Quash Subpoena, and Dismiss
Complaint* November
15, 2007, Order to Show Cause* RIAA
response to order to show cause* Response
to RIAA response* Reply
Memorandum in Support of Dismissal of Complaint for failure to state
claim and misjoinder* April
28, 2008, order and opinion denying motion to vacate ex parte
discovery order* (-- F. Supp. 2d --, 2008 WL 1851772)
Arista v. Does 1-21 (D.
Mass.)(renamed "London-Sire v. Doe 1") Linares
Declaration Submitted by RIAA in support of ex parte discovery order
motion* Consolidation
order* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Vacate Ex Parte Discovery Order and
Subpoena* Memorandum
of Law in Oppposition* Reply
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Vacate and Quash* Reply
Declaration of Jesse Robert Stengel* Reply
Declaration of Prof. Azer Bestavros* Defendant's
supplemental memorandum of law in support of motion to quash* Amicus
Curiae Brief in support of John Doe's motion to quash, submitted by
Electronic Frontier Foundation* RIAA
brief in opposition to EFF motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief* Order
granting leave to file amicus curiae brief* RIAA
brief in opposition to John Does' supplemental brief* 1919
Opinions of Attorney General 256* (November 10, 1919)(Document
referred to in above brief)RIAA
brief in opposition to amicus curiae brief submitted by Electronic
Frontier Foundation* Reply
memorandum of law of "John Does"* March
31, 2008, Decision* (542 F.Supp.2d 153)(Alternate
link) January
2, 2008, cease and desist letter* Motion
to strike Linares declaration Exhibits
A & B to motion to strike Linares declaration* RIAA
Motion for reconsideration* Plaintiffs'
opposition to motion to strike Linares declarations* Reply
in support of motion to strike Linares declarations* RIAA
motion to quash subpoena served on Massachusetts State Police* Request
for leave to file reply nunc pro tunc with exhibit A (MediaSentry
"investigative" web page) and exhibit B (letter to State Police)* Supplemental
memorandum in support of motion to strike* Correction
to supplemental memorandum in support of motion to strike*
Arista v. Does 1-22
(Providence, RI) Ex
Parte Motion for Discovery of Student Identities* Declaration
of Carlos Linares in support of Ex Parte Motion for Discovery of
Student Identities* Proposed
Order* January
7, 2009, Letter Withdrawing Subpoena Notice
of Dismissal Without Prejudice
Arista v. Does 1-27
(Portland, ME) Defendants'
Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Defendants'
Motion to Stay Subpoena* Reply
Memorandum on behalf of "John Does 16 & 18" in support of motion to
dismiss complaint* Reply
Memorandum on behalf of "John Does 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 15, 22, and 23" in
support of motion to dismiss complaint* January
25, 2008, Recommendation of Magistrate Judge sustaining complaint and
recommending order to show cause for Rule 11 violation* Objections
of Defendants John Doe #16 and 18 to January 25, 2008, Recommendation
of Magistrate Judge Kravchuk* RIAA
Brief responding to Brief of John Does 16 and 18* February
28, 2008, Letter of Robert Mittel to Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr.* RIAA
opposition to Rule 11 motion* Reply
memorandum* RIAA
Opposition to Motion to Vacate and Quash* RIAA
Opposition to Motion to Strike Carlos Linares Declaration* Reply
memo in support of motion to vacate and quash* Reply
memo in support of motion to strike* Defendants'
Supplemental Memorandum October
29, 2008, decision
Arista v. Does 1-34 (Raleigh,
NC) Brief
of John Does 13, 16, 17, and 19 in support of motion to dismiss or
sever*
Arista v. Escape Media
(SDNY) UMG
v. Escape Media Complaint Amended
Complaint, Arista v. Escape Media Exhibits
part 1 Exhibits
part 2 Exhibits
part 3 Exhibits
part 4 Memorandum
of law in support of jurisdiction defendants' motion to dismiss amended
complaint Memorandum
of law of defendants Escape Media, Samuel Tarantino, and Joshua
Greenberg in support of motion to dismiss amended complaint for failure
to state a claim Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in opposition to motion to dismiss for failure to
state a claim Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in opposition to Greenberg motion dismiss on
jurisdictional grounds Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in opposition to Westermann Clark motion to dismiss
on jurisdictional grounds
Arista v.
Finkelstein (Brooklyn, NY) Answer
and Counterclaims* March
8, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida to Judge Trager* March
15, 2007, Letter of Richard Altman to Judge Trager*
Arista v. Frawley (Albany, NY Defendant's
memorandum of law RIAA's
opposition memorandum of law Defendant's
reply memorandum of law
Arista Records v. Greubel
(Fort Worth, TX) Motion
to Dismiss Complaint* RIAA
Opposition Memo* Greubel
Reply Memo* September
1, 2006, Decision Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint* (Also published
at 453 F. Supp. 2d 961) (Alternate link hosted
by BNA) Answer
of David Greubel* Stipulation
of dismissal with prejudice*
Arista v. Lime Wire (New
York, NY)(RIAA case against Lime Wire) Copy
of complaint in Arista v. Lime Wire* Answer
and Counterclaim of Lime Wire defendants* October
16, 2006, Case Management Order* Lime
Wire's First Amended Counterclaims* Plaintiff's
memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss counterclaims* Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* February
8, 2007, Order, Denying Plaintiffs' Application for Stay of Discovery* February
15, 2007, Reply Memorandum of Law* Case
Management Order Entered June 18, 2007* October
19, 2007, Letter re Discovery Disputes* December
3, 2007, Decision Dismissing Antitrust Counterclaims* December
11, 2007, Scheduling Order* April
2, 2008, scheduling order* June
23, 2008, scheduling order for dispositive motions Defendants'
first memorandum of law Defendants'
second memorandum of law Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law Amicus
curiae brief of EFF and 8 other organizations Consent
injunction March
10, 2011, Decision, rejecting RIAA's statutory damages argument April
7, 2011, Decision Denying Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment as to 104 Works
Arista v. Tschirhart (San
Antonio, TX) May
24, 2006, Order Granting Defendant Leave to Add Affirmative Defenses,
Denying Leave to Add Counterclaims* August
23, 2006, Decision Granting Default Judgment Based on Spoliation of
Evidence*
Arista v. Usenet (New York, NY) Complaint
in Arista v. Usenet (Hosted by Wired.com) (Alternate
Link)(Hosted by Internet Law & Regulation)* November
24, 2008, decision dismissing counterclaims January
26, 2009, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Granting in Part, Denying in
Part, Plaintiffs' Motion for Discovery Sanctions Decision
granting plaintiffs' motions Order
of reference to Magistrate Judge
Associated Press v.
Meltwater (New York, NY) Complaint
Atlantic v. Andersen(Oregon) Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Plaintiff's
Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* Defendant's
Amended Answer and Counterclaims (Alternate
link)* Order
Limiting Hard Drive Inspection* Revised
Order Permitting Hard Drive Inspection* October
17, 2006, Declaration of Tanya Andersen* December
13, 2006, Order* RIAA
Opposition to Limitation of Depositions* Ms.
Andersen's Response* Lybeck
Declaration* Order
granting limitations on deposition of child and disabled person Defendant's
Amended Answer and Counterclaims* RIAA
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Stipulation
of Dismissal With Prejudice* Decision
of Magistrate Judge Granting Defendant's Attorneys Fees Motion*
(Westlaw cite: 2008 WL 185806)RIAA's
Objection to Magistrate's Order Permitting Counterclaims to be
Withdrawn Without Prejudice* RIAA
Objection to Magistrate's Order Granting Ms. Andersen's Attorneys Fees
Motion* January
14, 2008, Order and Decision permitting dismissal of counterclaims
without prejudice* (Westlaw Cite: 2008 WL 151825)January
16, 2008, Order and Opinion Affirming Magistrate's Recommendations and
Granting Defendant's Motion for Attorneys Fees* (Westlaw cite: 2008
WL 185806)Declaration
of Lory Lybeck* Defendant's
brief* Plaintiffs'
expert witness's declaration* Plaintiffs'
opposition brief* Lory
Lybeck reply declaration* Tanya
Andersen reply declaration* Defendant's
reply brief* May
14, 2008, Opinion and Order awarding defendant $107,834.00 in attorneys
fees* Defendant's
objections* Plaintiffs'
objections* July
28, 2008, Judgment
Atlantic v. Anderson
(Houston, TX) March
12, 2008, Decision granting RIAA summary judgment motion* Defendant's
opposition papers* June
24, 2008, order adopting Magistrate's report awarding defendant
$107,834 in attorneys fees and disbursements
Atlantic v. Boggs (Corpus
Christi, Texas) Transcript
of December 20, 2006, Court conference* RIAA
Request for Default* RIAA
Motion for Default Judgment* February
1, 2007, Order, Denying RIAA Motion for Default Judgment* Answer
and Counterclaims* Plaintiffs'
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* Reply
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* June
21, 2007, Expert Witness Designation by Plaintiffs* Unopposed
Motion for Extension of Time* Order
Granting Dept. of Justice 60 days to Intervene* Notice
of Settlement filed August 1, 2007*
Atlantic v. Boyer (Tampa, FL) Answer
and counterclaims* RIAA
memorandum in support of motion to dismiss counterclaims* May
6, 2008, Order and Opinion denying motion to dismiss counterclaims* Answer
to counterclaims Case
management report Scheduling
order Notice
of Settlement December
1, 2008, order
Atlantic v. Brennan (New
Haven, CT) February
13, 2008, Order and Decision denying application for default judgment*
(534 F. Supp.2d 278)Motion
for Reconsideration* Declaration
of Timothy Reynolds in Support of Motion for Reconsideration* Declaration
of MediaSentry's Elizabeth Hardwick in Support of Motion for
Reconsideration* Motion
for status conference* April
14, 2008, Order Denying Motion for "Reconsideration"* Amended
complaint (with no page 3)* Amended
complaint* December
10, 2008, decision denying motion for default judgment Notice
of Dismissal
Atlantic v. Dangler
(Rochester, NY) October
23, 2007, Decision, Denying RIAA Motion for Default Judgment* (---
F.Supp.2d ----, 2007 WL 3084728) RIAA's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Reconsideration* Hardwick
Declaration in Support of Motion for Reconsideration* Train-Gutierrez
Declaration in Support of Motion for Reconsideration* Exhibit
(AOL Letter) in Support of Motion for Reconsideration* Order
granting reconsideration and motion for default judgment*
Atlantic v. DeMassi
(Houston, TX) Answer
and Counterclaims* Exhibit
A (Original Complaint in Arista v. LimeWire)* Exhibit
B (November 2006 Report to USPTO on Filesharing Programs)* May
21, 2007, Order Dismissing Counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment and
Copyright Misuse*
Atlantic v. Does 1-14
(Portland, ME) Motion
to strike Linares declaration* Affidavit
of Theodore G. Fletcher* Motion
to vacate and quash* Exhibit
B* RIAA
opposition memo* Defendant's
reply memo*
Atlantic v. Does 1-25(New
York, NY) Defendant
John Doe's Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to (a) Sever
and Dismiss as to John Does 2-24 and (b) Quash Subpoena* Notice
of Motion to Vacate Ex Parte Order* (Alternate
link) (Alternate
link #2) Affidavit
of Zi Mei in Support of Motion* (Alternate
link) Affidavit
of Ty Rogers In Support of Motion* (Alternate
link) Exhibit
A* Exhibit
B* Exhibit
C* Exhibit
D* Exhibit
1 to Exhibit D (part 1)* Exhibit
1 to Exhibit D (part 2)* Exhibit
1 to Exhibit D (part 3)* Exhibit
1 to Exhibit D (part 4)* Exhibit
1 to Exhibit D (part 5)* Exhibit
1 to Exhibit D (part 6)* Exhibit
E* Exhibit
F* Exhibit
G* Memorandum
of Law In Support of Motion to Vacate Ex Parte Discovery Order* (Alternate
link) Appendix
1 to Memorandum of Law* Appendix
2 to Memorandum of Law* Appendix
3 to Memorandum of Law* Declaration
of Jonathan Whithead in Opposition* Exhibit
A* Exhibit
B* Reply
Memorandum of Law of John Doe #8 in Further Support of Motion to Vacate
Ex Parte Discovery Order* Reply
Affidavit of Zi Mei in Further Support of Motion to Vacate Ex Parte
Discovery Order* Exhibit
A (FTC Testimony of RIAA That File Sharers Are Unaware They are
Sharing)* June
6, 2006, decision denying motion to vacate ex parte discovery order*
Atlantic v. Howell (Phoenix,
AZ)(pro se) August
24, 2007, Order Granting Summary Judgment to Plaintiffs* August
31, 2007, Reconsideration Motion* October
3, 2007, Directing Briefing of 4 Questions* September
27, 2007, Order Granting Reconsideration and Vacating August 20th Order* Defendant's
Motion to Continue* Order
Scheduling Oral Argument for November 30th* Defendant's
Motion to Continue* Order
Denying Defendant's Motion to Continue, Scheduling Hearing for December
14th at 3:00 P.M., and Fixing December 7th as Cutoff Date for
Supplemental Briefs* RIAA
Supplemental Brief* December
10, 2007, Order* Amicus
Curiae Brief of Electronic Frontier Foundation in Opposition to
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment* Alternate
link Plaintiffs'
brief responding to EFF amicus curiae brief* RIAA
motion to compel hard drive inspection* April
14, 2008, order scheduling RIAA motion to compel hard drive inspection* Defendant's
response to motion for examination of hard drive and cd's* April
22, 2008, Order granting unopposed motion for examination of hard drive
and cd's* April
28, 2008, order scheduling final pretrial conference* April
29, 2008, Decision, Denying RIAA Motion for Summary Judgment* (554
F. Supp. 2d 976)Order
setting hearing date Plaintiffs'
motion to strike answer for spoliation of evidence Exhibit
F - Doug Jacobson "report" August
25, 2008, Minute Entry August
29, 2008, Order striking defendant's answer and granting default
judgment to plaintiffs
Atlantic v.
Huggins(Brooklyn, NY) Complaint. pro haec vice motion: Miller
declaration , Notice of
motion , and Proposed
order .
Affidavit in opposition . Exhibit
A* Exhibit
B* Exhibit
C* Exhibit
D* Exhibit
E* Exhibit
F* Exhibit
G* Exhibit
H* Judge's
Decision Granting Pro Hac Vice Motion. Letter
to Magistrate Judge asking him to require RIAA to produce a corporate
officer of plaintiffs, with settlement authority, to appear at
settlement conference. Letter
to Judge Trager requesting dismissal of Complaint. October
5, 2005, letter opposing request for conference (Alternate
link) October
6, 2005 letter of RIAA lawyers asking permission for Missouri lawyer to
participate by phone & for RIAA representative not to appear at all (Alternate
link) October
6, 2005, order of Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. (Alternate
link) October
7, 2005, Docket Entry
Atlantic v. Lenentine
(Portland, ME) Answer*
Atlantic v. Myers (Jackson, MS) Answer
of Defendant*
Atlantic v. Njuguna
(Charleston, SC) Answer
and Counterclaims* RIAA
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* Defendant's
Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* RIAA
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint For
Failure to State Claim and Violation of Due Process* Opposition
to Motion for Judgment on Pleadings Dismissing Complaint* Cross-motion
for Leave to File Amended Complaint* Proposed
Amended Complaint* Reply
Memorandum in Support of Motion for Judgment on Pleadings Dismissing
Complaint* Defendant's
response to RIAA's motion for permission to amend complaint*
Atlantic v. Raleigh
(Missouri) Complaint Answer
and Counterclaims August
18, 2008, Order and Opinion Dismissing Counterclaims August
19, 2008, order scheduling conference September 11, 2008 Plaintiffs'
motion to compel discovery Defendant's
Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Plaintiffs'
reply memo in support of motion to compel December
15, 2008, Order granting motion to compel further interrogatory
responses and attorneys fees Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss counterclaims Plaintiffs'
statement of expenses Shane
Cross declaration John
Ryan declaration Defendant's
memorandum in opposition Defendant's
memorandum in opposition Plaintiff's
reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss counterclaims Notice
of Supplemental Authority Decision
dismissing counterclaims Order
dismissing countreclaims Amended
answer and counterclaims Stipulation
of Dismissal With Prejudice
Atlantic v. Serrano (San
Diego, CA) December
28, 2007, Order and Decision Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint and
Granting Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims*
Atlantic v. Shutovsky (New
York, NY) Answer
and Counterclaims* July
26, 2007, Joint Letter Submitting Discovery Disputes* July
30, 2007, Order of Hon. P. Kevin Castel* February
6, 2008, Memo Endorsed Order of Hon. P. Kevin Castel*
Atlantic Recording v.
Williams (Pittsburgh, PA) Complaint Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint Plaintiffs'
Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
Atlantic v. Zuleta (Atlanta, GA) Declaration
of Francisco Zuleta* Amended
Answer and Counterclaim of Francisco Zuleta* Stipulation
of Dismissal* Evidence
of filing of Stipulation of Dismissal*
BMG v. Conklin (Pro se
case in Houston, TX) Motion* Opposition* Order* BMG v. Doe (Canada) Decision
of Federal Court of Appeal (PDF) (Alternate
Link)(HTML) Deposition
of Media Sentry President Gary Millin*
BMG v. Doe 1 (Raleigh, NC) Doe
response in BMG v Doe 1
BMG v. Does (E. D. Pa. CV
04-650) First
Order Denying Joinder (See Second Order Shown At This First Link) Second
Order Denying Joinder
BMG v. Does 1-10 (Raleigh, NC) Motion
to strike declaration, dismiss complaint, and quash subpoena*
BMG v. Does 1-11 (Portland, ME) Order
Reserving Decision on ex parte discovery application*
BMG Music v. Does 1-14
(Greensboro, NC) Notice
of Voluntary Dismissal
BMG v. Gonzalez (USCA 7th
Cir.)*Decision
affirming grant of summary judgment to plaintiffs
BMG v. Thao (Chicago, IL) Notice
of Dismissal* Fax* Letter*
Brownmark Films v.
Comedy Partners (USCA 7th Cir.) June
7, 2012, Decision
Capitol v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) Defendant's
brief Affidavit
of Stephen Robertson Exhibit
C - Notice of Grievance Committee hearing to determine probable cause
Capitol v. Does 1-16 (D. New
Mexico) May
24, 2007, Order, Denying Ex Parte Discovery Motion* September
9, 2007, Order, Requiring 40 days Notice and Full Sets of Papers for
John Doe defendants*
Capitol v. Fanguiaire
(Boston, MA) August
15, 2007, Denying RIAA Motion for Summary Judgment*
Capitol Records v. Foster
(Oklahoma) Amended
Answer and Counterclaims of Defendant Deborah Foster* September
8, 2005, Decision* October
5, 2005, Decision Denying RIAA's Motion to Strike Counterclaim for
Declaratory Judgment* Answer
and counterclaims* RIAA
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendant's
response to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* July
13, 2006, Order Dismissing Case and Finding Defendant to be Eligible
for Award of Attorneys Fees against Plaintiffs* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Deborah Foster's Motion for Attorneys Fees* Declaration
of Richard B. Wilkinson in Support of Deborah Foster's Motion for
Attorneys Fees* Amicus
curiae brief submitted, by EFF, ACLU, AALL, Public Citizen, and
ACLU of Oklahoma Foundation in Support of Debbie Foster Motion for
Attorneys Fees*(Alernate
link) August
14, 2006, Declaration of Marilyn Barringer-Thomson* RIAA
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief* Request
for Judicial Notice and Response to RIAA's Opposition to Court's
Acceptance of Amicus Curiae Brief* Plaintiffs'
Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees* Defendant's
Motion for Leave to File Reply* February
6, 2007, Order and Decision* (Westlaw Cite: 2007 WL 1028532)Plaintiff's
"Status Report"* February
15, 2007, Order, Fixing Schedule for (a) Plaintiffs to Complete
Discovery on Reasonableness of Defendant's Attorneys Fees, and (b)
Defendant to File Supplemental Request for Additional Fees* RIAA
Motion to "Reconsider" Order Granting Attorneys Fees Motion* RIAA
Motion to "Clarify" Scheduling Order* Ms.
Foster's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order* Ms.
Foster's Objections to RIAA's Motion to "Clarify"* Defendant's
Motion to Compel Production of RIAA's Attorneys' Billing Records* February
26, 2007, Order, Directing Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's Motion
to Compel by March 1, 2007* February
27, 2007, Order Denying "Clarification" Motion* Defendant's
Objections to RIAA's "Reconsideration" Motion* Advisory
Regarding RIAA's Default* Opposition
to Motion to Compel Turnover of Billing Records* Plaintiffs'
Motion for Leave to file Reply* March
15, 2007, Decision and Order Directing Production of RIAA's attorneys'
billing records* March
15, 2007, Order, Granting Leave to File Reply Brief* Motion
to Compel Compliance with March 15th order* RIAA
Reply Papers in Further Support of Reconsideration Motion* Opposition
to Motion to Compel* RIAA
Protective Order Motion* March
22, 2007, Order, Granting Motion to Compel, Rejecting Request to Place
Documents Under Seal, and Directing that Documents are Confidential
Pending Further Order of the Court* Defendant's
Motion to (a) Preclude Expert Testimony by Plaintiffs or (b) Compel
Expert Discovery* RIAA
Opposition Papers* Defendant's
Motion to Strike RIAA Opposition Papers* March
29, 2007, Order Granting Motion to Compel* March
30, 2007, Order Denying Motion for Extension as Moot* April
3, 2007, Objections to RIAA's Motion for Protective Order* Notice
of deposition* Motion
to quash deposition notice* Plaintiffs'
Motion for Leave to Serve Reply Papers* Order
granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Serve Reply Papers* April
6, 2007, Order Partially Granting Motion to Quash Deposition Notice* April
10, 2007, Decision, Granting Motion for Confidentiality of Attorneys'
Billing Records* April
10, 2007, Protective Order* April
23, 2007, Decision and Order Denying RIAA Reconsideration Motion*
(Westlaw Cite: 2007 WL 1223826)Supplemental
Fee Application* Declaration
in Support of Supplemental Fee Application* June
20, 2007, Order, Granting RIAA Request for Evidentiary Hearing* July
2, 2007, Order, Scheduling Evidentiary Hearing for July 5th* July
16, 2007, Order and Decision Directing RIAA to Pay $68,685.23 in
Attorneys Fees* Motion
for Judgment Awarding Atttorneys Fees* August
14, 2007, Statement of No Objection by RIAA* Order
Granting Motion for Judgment to be Entered on Attorneys Fees* Judgment
for Attorneys Fees* Ms.
Foster's Motion to Amend Judgment* RIAA's
Motion to Deem Judgment Satisfied* Exhibit
A to RIAA's Motion to Deem Judgment Satisfied (Cover letter + check)* Order
Partially Granting and Partially Denying Motion to Amend Judgment* September
10, 2007, Order Denying Motion to Deem Judgment Satisfied* Amended
Proof of Payment*
Capitol v. Frye (Winston Salem,
NC) Offer
of Judgment and Notice of Acceptance*
Capitol v. Laude (Portland, ME) Answer*
Capitol v. MP3 Tunes (New
York, NY) Complaint September
29, 2008, Decision, Partly Granting, Partly Denying, Motion to Dismiss Answer
and Counterclaims Amended
answer and counterclaims Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in support of motion to dismiss counterclaims and
stay discovery Declaration
of Michael Robertson Defendant's
Memorandum of Law Plaintiffs'
Reply Memorandum of Law Oral
argument of plaintiffs' motion to dismiss counterclaims, January 16,
2009 Decision
dismissing counterclaims, except counterclaim for declaratory judgment Defendants'
memorandum of law in support of motion for summary judgment August
22, 2011, decision, partially granting, and partially denying, summary
judgment motions October
25, 2011, decision granting and denying summary judgment motions January
9, 2012, decision denying Capitol Records' motion for certification of
interlocutory appeal Order
dismissing appeal Memorandum
of law in support of defendant Robertson's motion for summary judgment
on jurisdictional grounds June
25, 2012, Memorandum Opinion & Order Motion
for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant Declaration Memorandum
of Law July
23, 2012, Order denying defendant Robertson's motion for summary
judgment, granting attorneys' motion for leave to withdraw Memorandum
of Law in support of Robertson motion for reconsideration on
jurisdictional issues Memorandum
of Law in support of Robertson motion for reconsideration on liability
issues Memorandum
of Law in support of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration Memorandum
of Law in support of Robertson motion for reconsideration on
jurisdictional issues Memorandum
of Law in support of Robertson motion for reconsideration on liability
issues Memorandum
of Law in support of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration January
25, 2013, Scheduling order Memorandum
and Order granting plaintiffs' motions for reconsideration and denying
defendants' motions
Capitol Records v. ReDigi Inc.
(New York, NY) Complaint Answer January
19th Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers requesting summary judgment premotion
conference January
20, 2012, order scheduling preliminary injunction motion Plaintiff's
declarations Plaintiff's
memorandum of law January
24, 2012, letter of Richard Mandel to Court Declaration
of John Ossenmacher in opposition to preliminary injunction motion Declaration
of Larry Rudolph in opposition to preliminary injunction motion Declaration
of Ray Beckerman in opposition to preliminary injunction motion Defendant's
memorandum of law in opposition to preliminary injunction motion February
1, 2012, letter of Fenwick West to Court re Google amicus curiae
brief McMullan
Reply Declaration Piibe
Reply Declaration Plaintiff's
reply memorandum of law Plaintiff's
counsel's February 1, 2012, letter to Court opposing Google request February
1, 2012, order denying Google motion for leave to file amicus curiae
brief Oral
argument February 6, 2012 February
6, 2012, Decision Denying Preliminary Injunction Motion February
6, 2012, Order Denying Preliminary Injunction Motion Letter
of Ray Beckerman requesting premotion conference re Rdio shutoff Order
denying premotion conference Letter
of Morlan Ty Rogers to Court re case management plan Letter
of Richard Mandel to Court re case management plan Order
ruling on case management plan Case
management plan Stipulation
of Substitution Statement
pursuant to Local Rule 1.4 Order
requesting joint statement from plaintiff's counsel and proposed
incoming defendant's counsel Amended
Case Management Order Opinion,
March 30, 2013
Capitol Records v. Seeqpod
(New York, NY) Complaint
Capitol v. Sitaras (Brooklyn,
NY) Answer
Capitol Records v. Straw
(Boston, MA) Appearance
Capitol v. Video Egg (New
York, NY) Complaint Answer
of Defendant VideoEgg Motion
to dismiss Memorandum
of law Yalamanchi
affidavit Terrell
affirmation Order
denying adjournment request September
11, 2008, Scheduling Order March
5, 2009, decision, denying motion to dismiss, granting motion to
transfer [order vacated March 6, 2009]March
9, 2009, decision, denying HI5 motion to dismiss, granting HI5 motion
to transfer Stipulation
of Dismissal With Prejudice
Capitol v. Weed (Phoenix, AZ) Amended
Answer and Counterclaims* Motion
to dismiss complaint* Opposition
papers* Reply
papers* Supplemental
authority submitted by defendant* RIAA
response to supplemental authority* Motion
for leave to interpose counterclaims* Opposition
papers* Reply
papers* Stipulated
protective order for examination of defendant's hard drive* April
21, 2008, opinion and order partially granting and partially denying
motion for leave to amend answer* (2008 WL 1820667)Amended
answer and counterclaims* Original
Rule 7.1 Statement* Amended
Rule 7.1 Statement*
Cartoon Networks v. CSC Holdings
(New York, NY) August
4, 2008, Decision, U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit Amicus
Curiae Brief of United States
Case no. 162983070
v. MediaSentry (Michigan) Complaint Case
number 162983070, August 14, 2008, followup letter September
5, 2008, Letter of "Case # 162983070", and exhibits
Central Michigan
University v. MediaSentry (Michigan) Complaint
Chan v. Priority (Detroit, MI) Complaint June
18, 2008, Decision dismissing complaint
Combat Zone v. Does 1-34
(New York, NY) June
18, 2012, Decision of Hon. Colleen McMahon dismissing and severing as
to John Does 2-34
Combat Zone v. Does 1-84
(Boston, MA) October
4, 2012, Order to Show Cause October
15, 2012, Order to Show Cause, Hon. Jennifer C. Boal, Magistrate Judge November
26, 2012, Order of Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal directing
plaintiff's counsel to submit explanation Report
and recommendation for severance and dismissal of case, and quashing of
subpoenas Order
granting sanctions against plaintiff's attorney March
14, 2013, Order & Decision Adopting Report & Recommendation of
Severance & Dismissal, Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, District Judge
Digital Sins v. Does
1-27 (New York, NY) June
6, 2012, Opinion & Order granting discovery Doe
#1 Motion to Dismiss: Notice of Motion, Declaration, Exhibits Doe
#1 Motion to Dismiss: Memorandum of Law Plaintiff's
opposition memorandum of law Defendant's
reply memorandum of law
Digital Sins v. Does
1-245 (New York, NY) May
5, 2012, Decision of Judge Colleen McMahon, dismissing, severing,
quashing
Discount Video Center
v. Does 1-29 (Boston, MA) August
10 2012, Memorandum and Order Quashing All Subpoenas November
7, 2012, decision, denying motion for ex parte discovery, Hon. Leo T.
Sorokin, Chief Magistrate Judge
Dish Network v. ABC (New
York, NY) July
9, 2012, decision
Elektra v. Barker (New York,
NY) Complaint* Exhibit
A* Exhibit
B, part 1* Exhibit
B, part 2* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Opposition
to Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Defendant's
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* February
15, 2006, letter of Fred von Lohmann of Electronic Frontier Foundation,
requesting permission to serve amicus curiae brief in support
of Ms. Barker's dismissal motion* Amicus
Curiae Brief of Electronic Frontier Foundation in Support of Dismissal
Motion* (Alternate
link) Amicus
Curiae Brief of Computer & Communications Industry Association and
U. S. Internet Industry Association* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law Commenting on Amicus Briefs* RIAA
Brief Responding to Amicus Brief of Computer & Communications
Industry Association and Internet Industry Association* MPAA
Amicus brief* April
4, 2006, letter of Assistant U. S. Attorney Rebecca C. Martin* "Statement
of Interest" of United States Department of Justice* Memorandum
of Law of Defendant Tenise Barker in Response to Statement of Interest
of United States of America* November
28, 2006, Order of Hon. Kenneth M. Karas* January
9, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel, with copy of US v. Shaffer* January
10, 2007, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers, with copy of RIAA's November 15,
2004, testimony to FTC P2P File Sharing Workship* Docket
Entry. Oral Argument held. Decision reserved. Hon. Kenneth M. Karas* Elektra
v. Barker Jan. 26, 2007, argument, transcript request form* Transcript
of January 26, 2007, Proceedings, Elektra v. Barker 1:05-cv-7340 KMK
(USDC, SDNY)* August
22, 2007, Letter of Richard J. Guida in Elektra v. Barker
Transmitting Atlantic v. Howell * August
24, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman Responding to Guida Letter* August
28, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judge Karas in Elektra v. Barker
(Latin American Music decision)* August
29, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel (re Latin American Music case)* September
12, 2007, Letter of Brian E. Moran to Hon. Kenneth M. Karas* October
4, 2007, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers (Submitting Copy of September 27,
2007, order in Atlantic v. Howell)* October
15, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Kenneth M. Karas (Citing
Jury Instruction)* October
15, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Kenneth M. Karas (Re RIAAs's
Citation to Jury Instruction)* February
25, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Kenneth M. Karas in Elektra
v. Barker* February
28, 2008, Letter of Brian E. Moran to Hon. Kenneth M. Karas in Elektra
v. Barker* March
17, 2007, letter of Victor B. Kao to Hon. Kenneth M. Karas (Asking
judge to lift stay of discovery in Elektra v. Barker) *March
31, 2008, Decision of Hon. Kenneth M. Karas, Denying Motion to Dismiss
Complaint and Granting Leave to Replead* (551 F. Supp.2d 234)Notice
of reassignment* Sipulation
and order extending time to answer* April
11, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Richard J. Sullivan (re
1292(b) motion for interlocutory appeal)* April
17, 2008, Letter of Victor B. Kao to Hon. Richard J. Sullivan
(opposition to interlocutory appeal)* April
18, 2008, order, scheduling status report and time to answer* Amended
complaint* May
16, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Richard J. Sullivan (re
Reconsideration Motion)* May
20, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel and Timothy J. Reynolds to Hon.
Richard J. Sullivan (opposition to waiver of pre-motion conference for
reconsideration motion)* May
22, 2008, Opinion and Order denying motion for reconsideration* Answer
to Amended Complaint Notice
of Constitutional Question Stipulation
and order of settlement
Elektra v. Dennis (Jackson, MS) Complaint* Motion
to Dismiss Complaint or for Summary Judgment Dismissing Complaint* Defendant's
Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint or for Summary Judgment
Dismissing Complaint* Defendant's
Affidavit in Support of Summary Judgment Dismissing Complaint* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law Consenting to Dismissal "Without Prejudice"*
Elektra v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) Doe
brief in Elektra v. Doe Stephen
Robertson affidavit in Elektra v. Doe July
2, 2008, Order staying discovery and referring motions to dismiss,
strike, and quash to Magistrate Judge Brief
in support of motion Plaintiffs'
Opposition to Motion December
4, 2008, Decision affirming Magistrate Judge
Elektra v. Does
1-9 (Closed) Decision
of Hon. Robert W. Sweet, September 8, 2004* (Also published at 2004 WL
2095581) Elektra v.
Harless (Detroit, MI) First
Discovery Order
Elektra v. Licata (Cincinnati,
OH) Answer* Motion
to dismiss complaint* Plaintiffs'
memorandum in opposition to motion to dismiss* Defendant's
reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss* RIAA
memorandum of law in support of motion to voluntarily dismiss* Defendant'a
opposition to RIAA's motion to dismiss "without prejudice"* Decision
of Magistrate Judge Allowing Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Defendant's
Objections to Decision of Magistrate Judge RIAA
Response to Objections Defendant's
Reply Memorandum in Support of Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling Defendant
David Licata's response to RIAA motion for expedited discovery February
5, 2009, Decision Denying Motion for Expedited Discovery
Elektra Entertainment Group v.
Maphet (Wichita, KS) Complaint Answer
Elektra v. McCall
(Minnesota) Complaint* Answer*
Elektra v. McDowell
(Columbus, GA) RIAA's
Statement of Material Facts* Defendant's
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment* November
6, 2007, Order, Granting in Part, and Denying in Part, RIAA's Motion
for Summary Judgment* (2007 WL 3286622)
Elektra v. O'Brien (C.D. CA) March
2, 2007, Decision and Order to Show Cause, ordering RIAA plaintiffs to
show cause why case should not be dismissed as to defendant* (2007
ILRWeb (P&F) 1555)
Elektra v. Perez (Oregon) Docket
sheet* Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in support of initial motion to dismiss defendant's
counterclaim for attorneys fees* Defendant's
memorandum of law in opposition to plaintiff's initial motion to
dismiss defendant's counterclaim for attorneys fees* Record
of December 6, 2005, Order, Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaim, With Leave to Renew* Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law* Defendant's
memorandum of law* Order
denying defendant's motion to dismiss complaint, granting plaintiffs'
motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice* (Also reported at
2006 WL 3063493) Elektra v.
Santangelo (White Plains, NY) Complaint
(Alternate
link) Exhibit
A of Complaint Exhibit
B of Complaint, first part Exhibit
B of Complaint, cont'd Exhibit
B of Complaint, cont'd) Transcript
of May 6th court appearance Notice
of Motion to dismiss complaint (Alternate
link) Memorandum
of Law in support of motion to dismiss complaint (Alternate
link) Affidavit
of Morlan Ty Rogers in support of motion to dismiss complaint Exhibit
A (Complaint) Exhibit
A of Complaint Exhibit
B of Complaint, first part Exhibit
B of Complaint, cont'd Exhibit
B of Complaint, cont'd) Plaintiff's
Memorandum of Law in opposition to motion to dismiss complaint Reply
Memorandum of Law in support of motion to dismiss complaint Revised
Reply Memorandum of Law in support of motion to dismiss complaint Letter
of plaintiff's counsel requesting second oral argument and permission
to submit additional papers November
28, 2005, Order and Decision Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
Complaint* (Also published at 2005 WL 3199841 and 79 USPQ2d 1702)(Alternate
link)* Answer* Order
Affirming Discovery Rulings of Magistrate Fox* Docket
Sheet November 4, 2006* Notice
of Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice* Delcaration
of Richard L. Gabriel in support of RIAA's Motion to Dismiss without
Prejudice* Memorandum
of Law in support of RIAA's Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice* Memo
Endorsed, Filed February 21, 2007, Accepting Late-Filed Answering
Papers* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice, and in
Favor of Cross Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice or for Jury Trial* March
6, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel, and Memo Endorsed by Judge granting
application* Reply
Declaration of Tom Mizzone of MediaSentry* Reply
Declaration of Richard Gabriel* Reply
Memorandum of Law* Notice
of Pre-Trial Conference* Order
Filed March 21, 2007, Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Without
Prejudice* Mystery
Document (Stipulation of Dismissal Signed by Richard L. Gabriel only
and filed as a "Notice") "Memo
Endorsed" Order Dated April 2, 2007, Advising defendant she is free to
make motion to discontinue with prejudice* Stipulation
and Order entered April 9, 2007, dismissing case with prejudice except
for issue of defendant's entitlement to attorneys fees*
Elektra v. Santangelo II
(White Plains, NY) Complaint* Complaint
Exhibit A* Complaint
Notation that Exhibit B has not been filed electronically* Rule
26(f) Discovery Plan* Addendum
to Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan* Motion
for default judgment* Request
for entry of default* January
10, 2007, Default Judgment* Answer
and Counterclaim* Exhibit
A to Answer and Counterclaim* Exhibit
B to Answer and Counterclaim* January
31, 2007, Order of Judge Robinson granting motion of Jordan Glass for
admission pro hac vice* May
15, 2007, Memo endorsed Order denying application for judgment debtor
exam* July
9, 2007, Joint Letter of Plaintiffs and Defendant* July
13, 2007, Scheduling Order* July
18, 2007, Declaration of Richard L. Gabriel* Minute
entry for July 13, 2007, conference, vacating default judgment* Answer
and Counterclaims of Michelle Santangelo* Affirmation
of Jordan Glass in Opposition to RIAA Motion for Attorneys Fees* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition to RIAA Motion for Attorneys Fees* Answer,
Counterclaims, and Jury Demand* RIAA
Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Attorneys Fees in connection
with Vacating of Default Judgment* Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party
Complaint* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File 3rd Party Complaint* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendants'
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Add Third Party
Defendants* Exhibit
A (Affidavit of Service in Lewan v. Sharman)* Exhibit
B (Revised Proposed Third Party Complaint)* Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to RIAA Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer
and Counterclaims* Exhibit
A -- Defendants' Proposed First Amended Answer and Counterclaims* October
19, 2007, Letter of Jordan D. Glass to Hon. Mark D. Fox* October
23, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Mark D. Fox (Re
Misstatement)* October
23, 2007, Order of Hon. Mark D. Fox, Magistrate Judge, Establishing
Discovery Dispute Procedures for the Case* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Leave to
Amend their Answer* November
20, 2007, Letter Motion to Compel Discovery* Minute
entry for November 30, 2007, discovery conference before Magistrate
Mark D. Fox* Order
denying RIAA motion for attorneys fees without prejudice* February
15, 2008, Order and Decision of Hon. Mark D. Fox Denying Motion for
Leave to Implead* March
4, 2008, Order of Magistrate Judge Fox recommending denial of motion to
add counterclaims* Memorandum
of Law and Exhibits Document No. 79 Memorandum
of Law and Exhibits Document No. 80 Memo
Endorsed staying proceedings due to settlement in principle Order
scheduling settlement conference Order
extending stay for 2 days Notice
of Substitution of Counsel
Elektra v.
Schwartz (Brooklyn, NY) Answer
and Counterclaim* Exhibit
A to Answer and Counterclaim (Amicus Brief in Capitol Records v. Debbie
Foster)* October
28, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judge Trager (In connection with
summary judgment motion)* November
1, 2006, Letter of Richard J. Guida to Judge Trager (In connection with
summary judgment motion)* November
17, 2006, Letter of Richard J. Guida* November
19, 2006, Response of Ray Beckerman* Attachment
to Response of Ray Beckerman (Oct. 31-Nov. 2 email exchange)* Attachment
to Response of Ray Beckerman (Answer & counterclaim)* Attachment
to Response of Ray Beckerman (Exhibit A to Answer & counterclaim)* November
21st reply letter of Richard Gabriel* December
1, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judge David G. Trager* Elektra
v. Wilke, Affidavit in Support of Motion for Expedited Discovery* Elektra
v. Wilke, Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice* December
4, 2006, Order of Hon. David G. Trager* December
7, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judge Trager* December
4, 2006, Order* November
1, 2006, Letter of Richard J. Guida* February
28, 2006, letter of America Online* Defendant's
Initial Disclosures* December
11, 2006, Letter of Richard J. Guida to Judge David G. Trager* December
12, 2006, Letter, Containing Briefing Schedule* December
12, 2006, Order of Judge David G. Trager, Denying Reconsideration* December
14, 2006, Order Staying Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim Pending Guardian
Ad Litem Motion* January
19, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy* February
2, 2007, Letter of Timothy M. Reynolds (Medical issues; RIAA request
for expedited discovery)* February
4, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Medical issues; RIAA request for
expedited discovery; Electronic filing)* February
5, 2007, Order of Magistrate Robert M. Levy, Ordering Electronic
Filing, Fixing Conference, Ordering Defendant Counsel to furnish basis
for appointment of Guardian Ad Litem* February
16, 2007, Docket Entry of Order Scheduling Motion for Guardian Ad Litem* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Response to Motion for Guardian Ad Litem* March
2, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy* Exhibit
A (Docket Report in Priority v. Chan II)* Exhibit
B (February 13, 2006, order in Priority v. Chan II)* Exhibit
C (March 27, 2006, order in Priority v. Chan II)* Exhibit
D (Amicus curiae brief of ACLU, Public Citizen, EFF, AALL, and
ACLU-Oklahoma in Capitol v. Foster)* Exhibit
E (February 6, 2007, decision in Capitol v. Foster)* Exhibit
F (Excerpts from transcript of deposition of Dr. Doug Jacobson, UMG v.
Lindor, February 23, 2007)* April
12, 20067, Order of Magistrate Robert M. Levy Granting Defendant's
Motion for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem* May
2, 2007, Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem* May
2, 2007, Order Setting Conference Date and Directing Parties to Send
Letters* May
7, 2007, Letter of Lisa J. Borodkin (Guardian Ad Litem Reading
Materials)* February
6, 2007, Decision in Capitol v. Foster* April
23, 2007, Decision in Capitol v. Foster* In
Limine Motion in UMG v. Lindor* May
9, 2007, Letter of Richard J. Guida (Submitting Reading Materials for
Guardian Ad Litem)* May
10, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman Moving to Strike Letter of Richard J.
Guida* May
10, 2007, Order Denying Motion to Strike Guida May 10th Letter* June
1, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida ("Joint" Settlement Conference
Request)* June
3, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Opposing "Joint" Settlement
Conference Request)(Elektra v. Schwartz)* June
4, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida (Withdrawing Request for "Joint"
Settlement Conference)(Elektra v. Schwartz)* August
22, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Magistrate Judge Robert M.
Levy* September
7, 2007 Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy* September
11, 2007, Order, Setting October 15th Teleconference* September
20, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. David G. Trager (re Motion
for Judgment on Pleadings)* September
20, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (re Request
for Stay Pending Determination of Motion for Judgment on Pleadings)* September
20th-21st email exchange* October
1, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. David G. Trager (Re
Defendant's Motion for Judgment on Pleadings)* Exhibit
A, abbreviated version of September 20th-21st email exchange* October
1, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Robert M. Levy (Re Motion
for Stay During Pendency of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings)* Exhibit
A (Letter and enclosures to Judge Trager)* October
1, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. David G. Trager (Re
Defendant's Motion for Judgment on Pleadings)* Exhibit
A, Omitted September 21, 2007, 2:56 P.M., email of Ray Beckerman* October
1, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (Re Motion for
Stay During Pendency of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings)* October
3, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. David G. Trager (Briefing
Schedule for Motion for Judgment on Pleadings)* October
11, 2007, Order of Hon. Robert M. Levy staying proceedings until
November 13th status conference* Notice
of Motion (Dismissal of complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c))* Declaration
of Ray Beckerman* Memorandum
of Law* RIAA's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Pleadings* Defendant's
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Judgment on Pleadings* November
13, 2007, Order, Denying Application for Immediate Discovery* February
8, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* February
8, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman* February
18, 2008, Order of Hon. Robert M. Levy* February
25, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. David G. Trager in Elektra v.
Schwartz* Exhibit
A -- February 13, 2008, Decision in Atlantic v. Brennan* February
27, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (referring to LaFace v. Does 1-5
and Atlantic v. Brennan)* April
1, 2008, decision denying motion for judgment on pleadings* Stipulation
of dismissal with prejudice
Elektra v. Torres (Brooklyn,
New York) April
11, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Requesting Random Reassignment of
Case)* RIAA
Cover Sheet and Rule 7.1 Statement* April
17, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel Asking For Brooklyn Cases to Be
Deemed "Related" in Elektra v. Torres* Answer
and Counterclaims* Answer
and Counterclaims, Exhibit A (Amicus Brief filed by ACLU, Public
Citizen, EFF, AALL, and ACLU Foundation of Oklahoma in Capitol v.
Foster)* Defendant's
Initial Disclosures* Defendant's
First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiffs* Defendant's
First Request for Production of Documents and Things* Defendant's
Notice to Take Deposition of Elektra Entertainment* May
25, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida (Re Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims)* May
25, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Re Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims)* June
1, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida ("Joint" Settlement Conference
Request)* June
3, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Opposing "Joint" Settlement
Conference Request)(Elektra v. Torres)* October
11, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. David G. Trager with proposed
briefing schedule* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion for Random Reassignment* RIAA
Opposition Memorandum* Defendants'
Reply Memorandum* December
12, 2007, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers to Hon. David G. Trager* Exhibit
A - RIAA surreply in Arista v. Does 1-17* Exhibit
B - Oregon Attorney General reply memo* Exhibit
C - Oregon Attorney General reply affidavit* December
18, 2007, Decision and Order Denying Motion for Random Assignment of
Cases* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to RIAA Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
(Maverick v. Chowdhury* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to RIAA Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
(Elektra v. Torres)* RIAA
reply memorandum of law (Maverick v. Chowdhury)* RIAA
reply memorandum of law (Elektra v. Torres)* August
19, 2008, Decision Dismissing Counterclaims and Defense Elektra
v. Torres Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice
Elektra v. Werry
(Providence, Rhode Island) Elektra
v. Werry, Dist. Rhode Island 1:06-cv-00357, Docket Sheet*
Elektra v. Wilke
(Chicago, IL) Defendant's
Motion for Summary Judgment* Motion
for Expedited Discovery* Affidavit
in Support of Motion for Expedited Discovery* Stipulation
of Dismissal with Prejudice*
Elf-man LLC v. Does 1-57
(Portland, OR) May
14, 2013, Order, Findings, and Recommendation, Hon. Thomas M. Coffin,
Magistrate Judge
Fairey v. Associated Press (New
York, NY) Complaint
in Fairey v. Associated Press (hosted by American Lawyer)Answer
and counterclaims Memorandum
of Law in support of intervention motion Memo
endorsed postponing discovery and conference Memo
endorsed granting intervention
FBT Productions v. Aftermath
Records June
27, 2012, order granting leave to file supplemental complaint
Flava v. Gunter (US Ct App 7th
Circuit) August
2, 2012, opinion
Fonovisa v. Alvarez
(Abilene, TX) RIAA's
Opposition Memorandum of Law* Order
and decision denying motion to dismiss*
Fonovisa v. Does 1-9
(Pittsburgh, PA) Decision
dismissing as to Does 1-2, and 4-9* (2008 U.S. Dist. Lexis 27170,
2008 WL 919701)November
28, 2008, Order Affirming Rulings of Magistrate Judge Notice
of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice
Fonovisa v. Does 1-41
(Austin, TX) November
17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. Does 1-41 and 3 other cases under
Caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies ordering RIAA
plaintiffs to file future cases against one defendant at a time*
(2004 ILRWeb (P&F) 3053)(W.D. Texas 2004)
Foundation v. UPC
Nederland (Netherlands, District Court of Utrecht) Court's
decision (Alternate
link) (Alternate
link #2) (Alternate
link #3)* Expert
witness declaration* (Alternate
link) (Alternate
link #2) (Alternate
link #3) July
13, 2006, Decision of Amsterdam Court of Appeal Giordano v. Romeo Decision of 3rd District Court of Appeal of Florida Greenbaum v. Google (New
York, NY) October
23, 2007, Decision of Hon. Marcy S. Friedman in Greenbaum v. Google*
Hard Drive v. Does 1-90 Order
Denying Expedited Discovery
Ingenuity 13 v. Doe (Los
Angeles, CA) May
6, 2013, Order Issuing Sanctions, Hon. Otis D. Wright, II, District
Judge
In re BitTorrent Adult
Film Copyright Infringement Cases (Central Islip, NY) May
1, 2012, Order, Report & Recommendation July
31, 2012, Order Notice
and Order to Show Cause dated August 10, 2012 Kotzker
declaration November
20, 2012, decision of Hon. Arthur D. Spatt, District Judge (captioned
"Patrick Collins v. Doe 1") December
3, 2012, Decision, Hon. Gary R. Brown, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Interscope v. Does 1-100 (New
York, NY) Complaint Notice
of Motion Affidavit
of Daniel A. Singer Memorandum
of Law Exhibit
A Exhibit
B Memorandum
of law in opposition* Appendix
A* Appendix
B* Appendix
C* Appendix
D* Appendix
E* Order
setting Scheduling Conference date* April
6, 2006, Order of Hon. Richard J. Holwell, Denying Motion to Quash*
Interscope v. Does 1-7
(Newport News, VA) July
12, 2007, Denying Ex Parte Motion for Discovery* (Also published at
494 F. supp. 2d 388)Motion
for leave to file amicus brief* Proposed
Amicus Brief* RIAA
Opposition to Motion to File Amicus Brief* RIAA
motion to submit "supplemental authority"*
Interscope v. Does 1-40
(Tampa, FL) Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena* Order
Staying Subpoena*
Interscope v. Duty (Arizona) April
14, 2006, Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss* (Westlaw
Cite: 2006 WL 9880)
Interscope v. Kimmel (NDNY
Binghamton Divis.) June
18, 2007, Decision, Granting Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Declaration
of Richard A. Altman in Support of Motion to Dismiss* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss* November
14, 2007, Endorsed Order Staying Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to
Dismiss* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss* Reply
Declaration* Reply
Memorandum* December
10, 2007, Order Denying Motion to Dismiss*
Interscope v. Korb
(Charleston, SC) Answer
and Counterclaim in Interscope v. Korb, 3:06-cv-2644,
U.S.Dist.Ct.,Dist. So. Carolina, Charleston Divis.* Interscope v.
Leadbetter (Seattle, WA) Answer
of Defendant to RIAA Complaint Order
& Decision Partially Granting Dismissal and Denying Amendment* Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment* Selected
exhibits submitted in support of plaintiff's summary judgment motion* Defendant
Donald Leadbetter's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment* Exhibit
A to Defendant's Cross-Motion (Gary Millen deposition)* Exhibit
B to Defendant's Cross-Motion (Alan Pitcher deposition)* Exhibit
C to Defendant's Cross-Motion (Donald Leadbetter's affidavit)* Exhibit
B to Defendant's Cross-Motion (Donald Leadbetter deposition)* Defendant's
memorandum of law in support of motion for attorneys fees* Amicus
Curiae Brief (Alternate
link)* Order
Denying Motion for Attorneys Fees* Notice
of Appeal* Appellant's
Brief* February
10, 2009, Decision Affirming Order Denying Attorneys Fees Petition
for rehearing
Interscope Records v. Paul
(Boston, MA) Declaration
of service Answer RIAA
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
Interscope v. Rodriguez
(San Diego, CA) Complaint* August
17, 2007, Order and Decision Denying Default Judgment Application and
Dismissing Complaint for Failure to State a Claim for Relief* Amended
Complaint* August
30, 2007, Order of Reassignment*
Io v. Veoh (California) August
27, 2008, Order and decision granting defendant's motion for summary
judgment Order
denying Viacom motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief
James v. UMG Recordings (San
Francisco, CA) April
19, 2012, Opinion denying Defendant's motion for summary judgment
K-Beech v. Does 1-37 (Central
Islip, NY) May
1, 2012, Decision, Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown
Kruger v. MediaSentry
(Michigan Dept. Labor & Economic Growth) February
22, 2008, and March 31, 2008, correspondence July
12, 2008, letter in Kruger v. MediaSentry June
12, 2009, letter closing investigation because of absence of evidence
MediaSentry had been paid for its services Orders
denying defendant's motion to serve late expert report, granting joint
motion for lawyer-conducted voir dire, denying defendant's motion for
waiver of witness fees
LaFace v. Does 1-5 (Kalamazoo,
MI, and Marquette, MI) Linares
declaration Motion
and Memorandum of Law to Dismiss Complaint, Vacate Order, and Quash
Subpoena* RIAA
Opposition Brief* Defendant's
Reply Brief* February
22, 2008, order denying motion to dismiss and to quash* "Supplementary
motion to quash"* RIAA
response to "supplementary motion to quash"* August
12, 2008, letter of John Doe #5 August
26, 2008, RIAA response to letter of John Doe #5 John
Doe #5's Amended Response to Plaintiffs' Objection Exhibits Opinion
and order of Magistrate Judge denying John Doe #5's motion to quash Defendant
John Doe #5's Motion for Reconsideration December
2, 2008, Order of Magistrate Judge denying motion for reconsideration
LaFace v. Does 1-7 (Michigan) Complaint
in LaFace v. Does 1-7 Notice
of Dismissal
LaFace v. Does 1-14 (Arizona) University
of Arizona subpoena response* Motion
to quash by John Doe #3* John
Doe #8's Joining in motion to quash by John Doe #3*
LaFace v. Does 1-17 (Boston,
MA) Printouts
including capture dates subsequent to January 2, 2008, cease and desist
order*
LaFace v. Does 1-38 (Raleigh,
NC) Motion
for Extension of Time* Order
Granting Extension of Time* Brief
in Support of Motion by 7 "John Does" to vacate ex parte discovery
order, quash subpoena, and dismiss complaint for improper joinder* Declaration
of Thomas Swanton* February
27, 2008, Decision Dismissing for Misjoinder* (2008 WL 544992)
LaFace Records v. Griffin
(Boston, MA) Return
of service in LaFace Records v. Griffin
LaFace Records v. Maddox
(Pittsburgh, PA) Fonovisa v. Does 1-9 Amended
complaint
Lava v. Amurao (White Plains, NY) Answer
and Counterclaims* Plaintiff's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Exhibit
A to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* Exhibit
B to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Amicus
Curiae Brief of Electronic Frontier Foundation in Opposition to RIAA's
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims*
(Alternate
link) RIAA
Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* RIAA
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion by Electronic Frontier
Foundation for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief* April
20, 2007, Letter of Richard A. Altman to Hon. Charles L. Brieant* Transcript
of May 18, 2007, Oral Argument* May
23, 2007, Order of Hon. Charles L. Brieant, Denying RIAA's Motion to
Dismiss Counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment and Copyright Misuse,
and Granting EFF Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief* Plaintiff's
Opposition to EFF's Amicus Brief* Plaintiffs'
Reply to Second Counterclaim* June
27, 2007, Corrected Minute Entry in Docket Sheet Confirming First
Counterclaim is Dismissed, Second Counterclaim is not dismissed* Notification
of Conference* September
27, 2007, Letter of Richard Altman to Judge Brieant* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in support of voluntary dismissal* Exibits
to plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in support of voluntary dismissal* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in support of motion for summary judgment dismissing
counterclaim* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in support of discovery sanctions* Defendant's
motion for exclusion of MediaSentry evidence on ground of illegality,
compel deposition of Matthew Oppenheim, compel expense discovery* Defendant's
memorandum of law in support of exclusion of MediaSentry evidence on
ground of illegality* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to RIAA's 3 motions* Declaration
of Richard A. Altman in Support of application for continuance* Defendant's
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's motion to compel
discovery and for in limine exclusion of MediaSentry material* Reply
memorandum* RIAA
surreply memo in opposition to defendant's motion to exclude
MediaSentry's illegally procured "evidence"* Judgment* Notice
of appeal* Appellant's
Brief Appellees'
Brief Defendant-Appellant's
Reply Brief RIAA
Application for adjournment of appellate argument Timothy
Reynolds declaration Declaration
in opposition to adjournment request Order
granting RIAA request for adjournment June
1, 2009, letter of Timothy Reynolds indicating periods of unavailability November
16, 2009, Summary Order, USCtApp 2nd Cir
Lava v. Amurao II (White Plains,
NY) Summons
and Complaint* Exhibit
A Answer Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in support of motion for summary judgment Defendant's
memorandum of law in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment Plaintiffs'
Reply Memorandum in connection with summary judgment motions
Lenz v. Universal Music (San
Jose, CA) Decision
Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint
Lewan v. Sharman (Chicago,
IL)(class action against Kazaa) Complaint
in Lewan v. Sharman, U.S.Dist. Ct., N.D. Ill 06-cv-6736* Amended
Complaint in Lewan v. Sharman, U.S.Dist. Ct., N.D. Ill 06-cv-6736* Docket
Entry indicating case had been settled
Liberty Media v. Tabora
(New York, NY) Complaint Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint Amicus
Curiae Brief of Electronic Frontier Foundation in Support of Motion to
Dismiss Negligence Claim on Preemption Grounds July
9, 2012, Decision of Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, granting defendant's motion
to dismiss complaint
LondonSire Records v. Doe 1
(Boston, MA) March
31, 2008, Decision in Arista v. Does 1-21* (542 F.Supp.2d 153)(Alternate
link) Order
(a) treating University's letter as motion to quash, and (b) quashing
subpoena as to John Does #8, 9, and 14
Loud v. Does (New York, NY) Complaint.
Jane
Doe's Notice of Motion to Quash Subpoena Affidavit
of Morlan Ty Rogers in Support of Motion to Quash Exhibit
A Exhibit
B Jane
Doe's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Quash Memorandum
of law in opposition (Alternate
link) Appendix
to Memorandum of law in opposition (Alternate
link) Jane
Doe's Reply Memorandum of Law (Alternate
link) Judge's
"Memo Endorsed" Order (Handwritten order written on face of moving
papers) dated October 12, 2005* Notice
of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Appeal
preargument statement* Affidavit
of Ray Beckerman in support of motion for stay* Motion
information statement in support of motion for stay* Order
of Second Circuit Judge Robert D. Sack Granting Interim Stay of
Subpoena* Reply
Memorandum in Support of Motion for Stay November
23, 2005, Order of 3-Judge Panel dismissing appeal for lack of
jurisdiction* (Alternate
link)
Loud v. Sanchez (Tucson, Arizona) Plaintiffs'
Motion to Amend Complaint* Order
signed April 9, 2007, and entered April 11, 2007, Granting Plaintiffs'
Motion to Amend Complaint* Plaintiffs'
Notice Withdrawing Motion to Amend Complaint* Defendants'
Answer and Counterclaims* Amended
Answer and Counterclaims* Plaintiffs'
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendant's
Motion for Sanctions and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims* RIAA
Opposition to Motion for Sanctions* Defendant's
Reply in Support of Motion for Sanctions*
Louis Vuitton v. Warner
Bros. (New York, NY) Complaint
Malibu Media v. Does 1-5
(New York, NY) June
18, 2012, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers to Hon. Naomi Reice Buchwald, US
District Judge Notice
of Motion Memorandum
of Law Affidavit
of Morlan Ty Rogers Declaration
of John Doe #4 Plaintiff's
memorandum of law in opposition Declaration
of Tobias Fieser Exhibit
A Exhibit
B Defendant
John Doe #4's Reply Memorandum of Law August
24, 2012, Decision
Malibu Media
v. Does 1-5 / 12-2950 (New York, NY) June
1, 2012, Memorandum and Order
Malibu Media v. Does
1-10 (White Plains, NY) Order
granting discovery, severing, and dismissing, Hon. Edgardo Ramos,
August 21, 2012
Malibu Media v. Does
1-11 (White Plains, NY) Letter
requesting premotion conference in contemplation of Doe 1 motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim, and to quash subpoena
Malibu Media v. Does
1-13 (Central Islip, NY) Motion
for protective order, to sever, and/or to quash Order
staying enforcement of subpoenas Plaintiff's
"motion for clarification" Order
sealing information voluntarily disclosed by Verizon prior to return
date of subpoena and prior to ruling on motion to quash June
19, 2012, Report and Recommendation denying anonymous pro se motion
Doe
#5's motion to quash Plaintiff's
response to Doe #5's motion to sever and quash
Malibu Media v. Does
1-20 (Central Islip, NY) So
ordered notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice
Exhibit
B to declaration of Tobias Fieser
Malibu Media v. Does
1-28 (Tampa, FL) December
6, 2012, order and decision severing and dismissing as to Does 2-28,
Hon. James D. Whittemore, US District Judge
Malibu Media v. John
Does 1-6 (Philadelphia, PA) Order
denying motion to sever and quash, December 24, 2012, Hon. Cynthia M.
Rufe
Malibu Media v. John
Does 1-10 (Newark, NJ) April
19, 2013, Opinion and Order, Hon. Stanley R. Chesler, District Judge
Malibu Media v. John
Does 1-14 (Fort Wayne, IN) Plaintiff's
motion to strike its amended complaint
Malibu Media v. John
Does 1-19 (Trenton, NJ) Memorandum
of law in support of John Doe #8 motion to sever, dismiss, and quash
Maverick v. Becker (Brooklyn,
NY) November
22, 2006, Letter of Anthony J. Genovesi, Jr.* December
14, 2006, Letter of Anthony J. Genovesi, Jr.* December
20, 2006, Letter of Brian E. Moran*
Maverick v. Chowdhury
(Brooklyn, NY) April
12, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman Requesting Random Reassignment of
Case* RIAA
Cover Sheet and Rule 7.1 Statement* Answer
and Counterclaims* Answer
and Counterclaims, Exhibit A (Amicus Brief filed by ACLU, Public
Citizen, EFF, AALL, and ACLU Foundation of Oklahoma in Capitol v.
Foster)* Defendant's
Initial Disclosures* Defendant's
First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiffs* Defendant's
First Request for Production of Documents and Things* Defendant's
Notice to Take Deposition of Maverick Recording Company* April
17, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel Asking For Brooklyn Cases to Be
Deemed "Related" in Maverick v. Chowdhury* May
7, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida re Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* May
8, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman re Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* May
10, 2007, Letter of Brian E. Moran to Ray Beckerman, Requesting
Information "supporting defendant's claim of innocence"* May
11, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Brian E. Moran, Rejecting
Requesting Information "supporting defendant's claim of innocence" and
Demanding Withdrawal of Frivolous Case* May
15, 2007, Letter of Brian E. Moran* May
22, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman* May
23, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judge Trager* Exhibit
to Letter -- May 23, 2007, Order of Judge Charles L. Brieant in Lava v.
Amurao* May
29, 2007, Letter of Richard J. Guida (Re Motion to Dismiss
Counterclaims Conference Request)* May
30, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Re Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
Conference Request)* Exhibit
A, Capitol v. Foster, October 5, 2005* Exhibit
B, Warner v. Stubbs, March 13, 2007)* June
1, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida ("Joint" Settlement Conference
Request)* June
3, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Opposing "Joint" Settlement
Conference Request)(Maverick v. Chowdhury)* December
18, 2007, Letter of Victor B. Kao to Hon. David G. Trager requesting
briefing schedule for motions to dismiss counterclaims* December
18, 2007, Order Denying Motion for Random Assignment of Cases* Memorandum
of Law of Plaintiffs in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to RIAA Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
(Maverick v. Chowdhury* RIAA
reply memorandum of law (Maverick v. Chowdhury)* August
19, 2008, Decision Dismissing Counterclaims and Defense Maverick
v. Chowdhury, Minute Entry noting settlement in court record
Maverick v. Goldshteyn
(Brooklyn, NY) November
15, 2005, Letter to Judge Trager November
21, 2005, response by RIAA Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Reply
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* July
28, 2006, Letter of Richard Gabriel to Judge Trager* July
29, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judge Trager* July
31, 2006, Decision of Judge David G. Trager Denying Motion to Dismiss
Complaint* (Also published at 2006 WL 2166870) Defendant's
Answer to Complaint* December
27, 2006, Order, Scheduling in-person, all principals, settlement
conference* Docket
Entry for January 17, 2007, settlement conference, with Matthew
Oppenheim of RIAA acting as "principal" of record company plaintiffs* Stipulation
and Order of Settlement*
Maverick v. Harper (San
Antonio, TX) August
7, 2008, Decision denying summary judgment unless RIAA stipulates to
$200 per infringement damages Notice
of Trial September
16, 2008, Decision and Order denying reconsideration motions RIAA's
motion for entry of judgment for $200 per infringement 5th
Circuit Decision Petition
for Certiorari Supreme
Court orders RIAA to respond RIAA
response in opposition to petition for certiorari
Media Products v. Does
1-26 (New York, NY) September
4, 2012, Opinion & Order, District Judge Harold Baer
Media Products v.
Does 1-120 (Springfield, MA) Defendant
Doe 83's memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss
MegaUpload v. UMG (San Jose,
CA) Complaint
MGM v. Grokster (C.D. California) March
29, 2005, oral argument before US Supreme Court United
States Supreme Court Decision Denying Defendants' Motions for Summary
Judgment of Dismissal (pdf file at EFF) United
States Supreme Court Decision Denying Defendants' Motions for Summary
Judgment of Dismissal(online at Findlaw) September
27, 2006, Order and Decision, Granting Plaintiffs Summary Judgment as
to Liability Against Streamcast* October
16, 2007, Granting in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Permanent Injunction*
Mick Haig Productions v.
Does 1-670) (Dallas, TX) September
9, 2011, District Court decision July
12, 2012, Decision of US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Mostly Memories v. For
Your Ease (7th Circuit) May
27, 2008, Decision, Mostly Memories v. For Your Ease
Motown v. DePietro (Pro Se
case) (Philadelphia, PA) February
16, 2007, Order and Decision* Docket
sheet*
Motown Record v. Doe (Los Angeles,
CA) October
7, 2008, Order granting discovery solely for purpose of obtaining
injunctive relief
Motown v. Does 1-99 (New
York, NY) Notice
of motion to vacate ex parte discovery order, quash subpoenas, and
sever and dismiss as to John Does 2-99* Affidavit
of Morlan Ty Rogers in Support of Motion* Affidavit
of Zi Mei in Support of Motion* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law In Opposition to Motion* John
Doe's Reply Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion* Transcript
of July 6, 2006, proceeding* Order
dissolving stay*
Motown Record Company v.
Kovalcik (Philadelphia, PA) Complaint Answer Plaintiffs'
memo of law to dismiss counterclaims Defendant's
opposition Plaintiff's
reply memo Decision
granting motion to dismiss counterclaims Defendant's
memo in support of motion for judgment on pleadings Plaintiffs'
opposition memo Order
denying defendant's motion without prejudice, fixing discovery schedule Stipulation
of dismissal with prejudice
Motown v. Liggins (M.D.
Alabama) November
9, 2006, Decision Denying Summary Judgment in Motown v. Liggins,
05-cv-273, M.D. Alabama* (also reported at 2006 WL 3257792)
Motown v. Lisberg (C.D.
California) Judgment
Based on Settlement Stipulation*
Motown v. Nelson (Detroit, MI) Computer
Protective Order Defendant's
Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Testimony of Teenager (Alternate
link) Granado
Deposition Transcript Excerpts*
New Sensations v. Does
1-83 (Boston, MA) November
2, 2012, Decision of Hon. F. Dennis Saylor IV, severing and dismissing
New Sensations v.
Does 1-201 (Boston, MA) September
21, 2012, Order to Show Cause, Hon. Richard G. Stearns, US District
Judge October
12, 2012, docket sheet (with electronic order severing & dismissing
as to Does 2-201)
New Sensations v.
Does 1-1474 Order directing plaintiff to dismiss as to John Doe
defendants for whom it cannot make sufficient showing of jurisdiction
and venue
Nieman v. VersusLaw (US Ct
app7th Cir.) /u> March
19, 2013, Decision, Affirming Dismissal of Complaint Patrick Collins Inc.
v. Doe 1 (Central Islip, NY) (see also "In re Bit Torrent Adult Film
Copyright Infringement Cases (Central Islip, NY)") November
20, 2012, decision of Hon. Arthur D. Spatt, District Judge Patrick Collins
Inc. v. Does 1-45 (New York, NY) Doe
#8 pro se motion to quash Notice
of Motion by Doe #41 Memorandum
of Law Doe
#41 Declaration Morlan
Ty Rogers Affidavit Plaintiff's
memorandum of law responding to motion by defendant Doe #8 Plaintiff's
memorandum of law in opposition to motion by Doe #41 Reply
Memorandum of Doe #41 Doe
#1 motion to quash Plaintiff's
opposition memorandum August
23, 2012, Order granting Doe #41 motion to sever, dismiss, and quash,
Hon. Barbara S. Jones Patrick Collins
v. John Does 1-6 (Washington, DC) Defendant's
memorandum of law in support of motion for summary judgment or
dismissal of complaint Patrick Collins
Inc v. John Does 1-11 (Central Islip, NY) Report
and recommendation severing as to John Does 2-11 Order
granting discovery as to John Doe #1 only July
12, 2012, order of Judge Joseph F. Bianco, dismissing, severing, and
quashing Perfect 10 v. Tumblr Complaint Priority v. Beer (Columbus,
GA) Answer
and Counterclaims* RIAA
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Priority v. Chan (Detroit,
MI)(Closed) Order
accepting dismissal with prejudice and declining to award attorneys fees Order
refusing to reopen case and holding that plaintiff must get guardian ad
litem appointed in order to sue 13-year old child* Priority v. Chan II
(Detroit, MI) Complaint
Motion for appointment of guardian ad litem (Alternate
link) (Alternate
link #2) Order
denying motion for appointment of guardian ad litem* Opinion
and Order Dismissing Case* Priority v. Fines
(Indianapolis, IN) Defendant's
Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim* RIAA's
opposition brief* Defendant's
reply brief in support of motion to dismiss* Decision on damages RIAA v. Atkinson (Boston, MA) Motion
for Voluntary Dismissal RIAA v. Buckley (Boston, MA) Motion
to enforce judgment Motion
to Withdraw Motion to Enforce Judgment RIAA v. Viola (Boston, MA) Motion
to withdraw judgment enforcement motion Robertson v.
MediaSentry (Raleigh, NC) Notice
of Probable Cause Hearing December
4, 2008, Letter of Matthew J. Oppenheim and "The Oppenheim Group" Rogers v. Capitol Records
(Nashville, TN) Complaint Safety Point Products
v. Does 1-14 (Cleveland, OH) Opinion
and Order, District Judge James S. Gwin, April 4, 2013 SONY v. Arellanes (Sherman,
Texas) Complaint* Answer* Amended
Complaint* Defendant's
Request for Admissions* Defendant's
Request for Documents* Defendant's
Interrogatories* Motion
to Compel Inspection of Hard Drive* Opposition
to Motion to Compel Inspection of Hard Drive* Defendant's
Suggested Protective Order* RIAA
Reply Memorandum* Arellanes
SurReply Memorandum* October
27, 2006, Order, Restricting Hard Drive Inspection to Inspection By
Mutually Agreed Upon Neutral Computer Forensics Expert* March
14, 2007, Order Granting Reconsideration of Protective Order Motion and
Revising October 27, 2006, Order (Alternate
link)* SONY v. Cloud (Philadelphia, PA) August
22, 2008, decision denying motion to dismiss Defendant's
motion for reconsideration, memorandum of law Defendant's
motion for reconsideration, part 1 of exhibits Defendant's
motion for reconsideration, part 2 of exhibits Defendant's
Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint Plaintiff's
Opposition Memorandum United
States Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Determine if
Intervention is Appropriate US
Department of Justice brief arguing constitutionality of RIAA's
statutory damages theory Order
granting DOJ motion to intervene (article only)Defendant's
motion for leave to respond to DOJ brief Free
Software Foundation Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief Proposed
Amicus Curiae Brief Submitted by Free Software Foundation Defendant's
response to Government brief May
29, 2009, Decision Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Declining to
Rule on Constitutionality of RIAA's Statutory Damages Theory SONY v. Crain (Beaumont, Texas) Answer
and Counterclaim* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim for
Declaratory Judgment* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim for
Declaratory Judgment* Motion
to Amend Counterclaims* Stipulation
for Injunction* SONY v. DeMaria (Charleston,
South Carolina) Answer
in SONY v. DeMaria* SONY v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) SONY
v. Doe Motion* (See also Warner v. Doe SONY v. Does 1-5 (Los
Angeles, CA) Order
dismissing as to Does 2-5 for improper joinder* Order
denying RIAA motion for reconsideration of order dismissing as to Does
2-5 for improper joinder* Order
dismissing as to plaintiffs Atlantic, Capitol, Elektra, Arista,
Priority, and Maverick, for improper joinder of plaintiffs* SONY v. Does 1-10 (Fresno,
CA) Request
for Judicial Notice* Request
for Special Notice* Declaration
of Counsel* SONY v. Does 1-40
(New York, NY) SDNY 04cv473(Closed) (Also published at 326 F. supp. 2d
556, 2004 Copyr. L. Decis. P28,842, 71 U.S.P.Q.2d 1661) Amicus
Brief submitted by EFF, ACLU, and Public Citizen SONY BMG Music Entertainment v.
Fillo (NH) Amended
complaint Defendant's
motion for change of venue Defendant's
memorandum of law SONY Music Entertainment v.
Kruger (Kalamazoo, MI) Complaint Defendant's
motion for appointment of pro bono counsel Order
granting defendant's motion for appointment of pro bono counsel SONY v. Merchant
(Sacramento, CA) March
27, 2007, Letter of Merl Ledford III Notice
of Voluntary Dismissal* April
3, 2007, Letter, of Thomas Kerr* April
9, 2007, Letter of Merl Ledford III* SONY BMG Music Entertainment
v. Moursy (Raleigh, NC) Amended
Answer With Counterclaims Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims Defendant's
memorandum of law in opposition to RIAA motion to dismiss counterclaims SONY v. Reese (Houston, TX) Answer* SONY v. Scimeca (Newark, NJ)
(Closed) Counterclaim SONY BMG Music Entertainment v.
Simms (Atlanta, GA) Complaint Answer
with Counterclaim Defendant's
Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer Plaintiff's
Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim Plaintiffs'
opposition Order
granting defendant's motion for leave to file amended answer Amended
answer Stipulation
of Dismissal Without Prejudice SONY BMG Music Entertainment v.
Stade (Rochester, NY) Summons
and complaint December
4, 2008, order scheduling motion to vacate default Declaration
in support of motion to be relieved of default Answer Order
granting motion to vacate default SONY BMG Music v. Tenenbaum
Transcript
of June 17, 2008, conference attended by RIAA lawyers and pro se
defendants Plaintiffs'
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims Defendant's
Protective Order Motion for Hard Drive Inspection Defendant's
Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims Defendant's
Amended Counterclaims Defendant's
Motion to Add RIAA as Additional Defendant on Counterclaims Motion
to Adjourn PreTrial Conference Motion
to Adjourn PreTrial Conference Notice
of Constitutional Question Defendant's
PreTrial Memorandum Plaintiffs'
motion to compel additional discovery responses from defendant Motion
and memorandum of law in support of internet audio-visual coverage Declaration
of John Shin Declaration
of Charles Nesson Plaintiffs'
motion to compel discovery from Judy Tenenbaum Exhibit
A Hearing
Notice Rescheduled
hearing notice Defendant's
opposition to motion to compel Affidavit
of Judie Tenenbaum Defendant's
opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel additional discovery
responses January
14, 2009, Order and Decision Granting Internet Television Access to
January 22nd Oral Arguments Petition
for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition Motion
for expedited consideration or stay Defendant's
Response to RIAA Motion for Stay Motion
to Depose Matthew Oppenheim Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion January
20, 2009, Order Adjourning Argument to February 24th Case
Opening Notice January
21, 2009, order fixing briefing schedule Plaintiffs'
Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel Deposition of Matthew J.
Oppenheim Exhibit
A -- January 21, 2009, Letter of Timothy M. Reynolds Threatening Rule
11 Sanctions Amicus
Curiae brief of Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public.Resource.org,
Media Access Project, Internet Archive, Free Press, California First
Amendment Coalition, and Ben Sheffner Amicus
Curiae Brief of Associated Press, New York Times, Courtroom Television
Network, Dow Jones & Co., Gannett Co. Inc., The Hearst Corp.,
Incisive Media, National Public Radio, NBC Universal Inc.,
Radio-Television News Directors Association, The Reporters Committee
for Freedom of the Press, The E.W. Scripps Co., Tribune Co., and
Washington Post Digital Opposition
Brief of Joel Tenenbaum Amicus
curiae brief of CVN RIAA
Reply Brief Order
denying motion to submit amicus brief of AP, NYT, Washington Post, and
other news organizations Order
granting motion to submit amicus brief by Electronic Frontier
Foundation and other organizations Order
granting motion to submit amicus brief by Courtroom View Network Order
staying proceedings in part Order
scheduling April 7, 2009, oral argument in US Court of Appeals for
First Circuit Motion
to proceed with hearing without streaming Defendant's
motion to stay in part the February 24th omnibus motion hearing Defendant's
motion for leave to file reply brief in support of motion to compel
Matthew Oppenheim deposition Defendant's
reply in support of motion to compel Matthew Oppenheim deposition Exhibit
A Exhibit
B Exhibit
C Exhibit
D February
23, 2009, Order February
20, 2009, Order of US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Dept.
of Justice 2nd Request for Extension of Time Motion
for permission to file surreply memo Proposed
surreply memo Order
disclosing Judge Gertner relationships to plaintiffs' and defendant's
counsel March
4, 2009, fixing schedule for reconsideration motions Order
denying motion to compel deposition of Matthew Oppenheim Memorandum
of law in support of defendant's motion to dismiss statutory damages
claim on constitutional grounds Notice
by RIAA First
Circuit Notice of Argument Defendant's
Supplemental Brief Motion
for late filing Motion
for reconsideration Defendant's
memorandum of law Exhibit
A Exhibit
C RIAA
supplemental brief 'Notice'
of 'apology' Motion
for leave to file amicus curiae brief Proposed
amicus curiae brief of Free Software Foundation Department
of Justice Motion to Intervene Department
of Justice Memorandum of Law Order
denying reconsideration motion Plaintiffs'
Memorandum in Opposition Order
granting Free Software Foundation motion for leave to file amicus
curiae brief and US Dept of Justice motion for leave to file oversized
brief -MP3 File
of April 8, 2009, Oral Argument in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v.
Tenenbaum in 1st Circuit Court of Appeals -Alternate
enhanced volume version ready for download (unofficial-prepared by
reader "Alter_Fritz")-Collection
of YouTube Links (unofficial-prepared by Slashdot reader "mariushm")John
Perry Barlow expert witness report Opposition
to motion for leave to file supplemental authority Motion
for leave to file second amended answer Proposed
second amended answer Order
granting FSF motion for leave to file supplemental authority First
Circuit, April 16, 2009, Decision, Barring Webcast Plaintiffs'
Motion for Leave to File Response to Amicus Curiae Brief Plaintiffs'
Response to Amicus Curiae Brief Order
granting plaintiffs leave to respond to amicus curiae brief Defendant's
notice of motion for rehearing en banc, and district court motion for
stay Plaintiffs'
supplemental authority opposing defendant's motion for leave to amend
answer Exhibit
B-Decision in UMG Recordings v. Martino Order
adjourning motions to June 5th Plaintiffs'
opposition to defendant's motion for leave to amend answer Plaintiffs'
motion to accelerate June 5th hearing and for permission to conduct
Chicago deposition of unnamed witness by telephone Order
denying rehearing en banc Order
authorizing telephone deposition Motion
for leave to file revised amicus curiae brief Proposed
revised amicus curiae brief of Free Software Foundation May
6, 2009, Protective Order Order
partially granting, partially denying, plaintiffs' motion to compel
responses to written discovery requests Plaintiffs'
opposition to FSF motion for leave to file revised amicus curiae
brief Exhibit
B Motion
for Leave to File Proposed
reply brief responding to DOJ Proposed
reply brief responding to RIAA Orders
granting motion of defendant to file reply briefs and of amicus to file
revised amicus brief Notice
of submission of proposed order Proposed
Protective Order May
19, 2009, protective order for inspection of defendant's hard drive Order
accompanying protective order May
28, 2009, Scheduling Order Motion
for Stay Petition
for Certiorari Defendant's
response to scheduling order Plaintiffs'
response to scheduling order Order
denying stay Motion
for sound recording Order
taking motions under advisement Order
denying motion for sound recording Defendant's
memorandum of law "relating to various issues" Decision
denying RIAA motion to compel production of defendant's parents'
computer Jun
15, 2009, decision denying motion to dismiss for unconstitutionality Defendant's
response to plaintiffs' motion to exclude expert witnesses &
postpone summary judgment motion filing date Declaration
responding to plaintiffs' motion to compel further discovery responses Plaintiffs'
motion to modify discovery schedule, obtain new discovery, postpone
summary judgment motions Order
dismissing counterclaims, denying motion to dismiss fair use defense June
16, 2009, Decision denying motion to exclude expert witnesses, granting
motion to compel discovery Plaintiffs'
motion to assess attorneys fees & costs against Joel Tenenbaum Defendant's
motion to compel plaintiffs' responses to interrogatories Motion
objecting to MediaSentry evidence "Response"
of Charles Nesson to June 16th order Motion
to exclude expert witness Barlow Opposition
to defendant's motion to compel answers to interrogatories Order
excluding proposed expert testimony of John Perry Barlow Order
denying defendant's motion to compel interrogatory answers, compelling
plaintiffs to provide revenue information Plaintiffs'
Motion for Discovery Sanctions & Protective Order
Order
to show cause in connection with plaintiffs' motion for discovery
sanctions and protective order Plaintiffs'
opposition to defendant's motion to suppress MediaSentry materials Response
to order to show cause Plaintiffs'
reply to Nesson response Opposition
to motion for leave to call ethnomusicologist as expert witness Plaintiffs'
motion for protective order for revenue information Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in support of motion for partial summary judgment
dismissing fair use defense Plaintiffs'
statement of undisputed facts Plaintiffs'
appendix part 1 Defendant's
motion for internet access Defendant's
motion to waive witness fees Defendant's
motion for lawyers to conduct voir dire of jurors Order
directing parties to brief issue of whether Fair Use is triable by jury Order
granting protective order as to 3rd party agreements, denying
protective order as to revenue information Plaintiffs'
motion for "clarification" Plaintiffs'
response to motion for internet access Order
allowing internet access for demonstration purposes Plaintiffs'
motion to exclude John Palfrey Plaintiffs'
Pretrial Memorandum Exhibit
A juror questions Exhibit
B witness list Exhibit
C exhibit list Exhibit
D proposed jury instructions Exhibit
E proposed verdict form Defendant's
opposition to plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on fair
use Defendant's
supplemental memo in opposition to plaintiffs' partial summary judgment
motion Order
scheduling 7/20 conference & 7/27 trial Atlantic
Recording Notice of Dismissal Plaintiff's
response re fair use jury trial question Defendant's
pretrial memorandum Exhibit
A witness list Exhibit
B exhibit list Exhibit
C requested jury instructions Order
denying motion to suppress MediaSentry evidence on ground of illegality Joint
proposed jury questionnaire Plaintiffs'
in limine motion re Wayne Marshall as fact witness Plaintiffs'
in limine motion re Felix Oberholzer-Gee as expert witness Orders
denying reconsideration of motion to submit late expert report of Wayne
Marshall, denying defendant's motion to preclude proof of more than 5
song files, granting plaintiffs' in limine motion to exclude expert
testimony of Oberholzer-Gee Order
excluding Palfrey expert testimony Order
dismissing fair use defense Order
requesting further argument on definition of "wilfulness" Plaintiffs'
response to jury instruction no. 110 Order
that all issues other than copyright ownership will be left to jury Defendant's
proposed jury instruction on damages Order
directing verdict on liability Jury
instructions Jury
verdict Plaintiffs'
motion for entry of judgment Defendant's
motion for extension of time Defendant's
motion for extension granted Order
that Massachusetts cases to no longer be consolidated Defendant's
opposition brief Decision
granting in part, denying in part, plaintiffs' motion for permanent
injunction Judgment Order
Scheduling Post-Judgment Motions Order
Scheduling Attorneys Fees and Sanctions Motions Decision
explaining ruling striking fair use defense Motion
for new trial Department
of Justice opposition brief SONY
BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum second RIAA request for extension
of time to answer remittitur motion Capitol
Records v. Thomas-Rasset RIAA request for extension of time in which to
make up its mind about accepting or challenging reduced verdict Oral
argument scheduled for February 16th RIAA's
memorandum in opposition Notice
of withdrawal of motion Defendant's
reply brief in support of motion for new trial or remittitur Tenenbaum
& his attorney ordered to pay RIAA's costs on motion to compel Order
assessing attorneys fees RIAA's
notice of appeal RIAA
appellate brief RIAA
brief Tenenbaum
brief Amicus
Brief of Electronic Frontier Foundation RIAA
reply brief Tenenbaum
reply brief Oral
argument (mp3 audio file) September
16, 2011, opinion of US Court of Appeals for 1st Circuit Petition for rehearing en banc Defendant's
brief after remand Department
of Justice January 27, 2012, memo RIAA
memo of law, January 27, 2012 Defendant's
reply memorandum responding to Department of Justice Defendant's
reply memorandum responding to plaintiffs RIAA
motion to strike defendant's reply briefs Tenenbaum
response to motion to strike Petition
for certiorari Amended
further submission of defendant (request for new trial Plaintiff's
motion to strike amended further submission August
23, 2012, decision of Hon. Rya W. Zobel Notice
of Appeal, September 17, 2012 Appellant's
Brief Sunlust Pictures, LLC v.
Nguyen (Tampa, FL) Transcript
of November 27th hearing.pdf Third Degree Films v.
Does 1-47 (Boston, MA) October
2, 2012, Memorandum and Order, Hon. William G. Young, US District Judge Third Degree
Films v. John Does 1-110 (Newark, NJ) Order
denying discovery
Tiffany v. eBay July
14, 2008, Decision, Hon. Richard J. Sullivan UMG Recordings v. Adams (Omaha,
NE) Complaint UMG Recordings v. Briggs
(Boston, MA) Declaration
of Service UMG Recording v. Ceesay
(Maryland) Order
vacating default judgment Plaintiffs'
request for settlement conference Stipulation
of voluntary dismissal without prejudice UMG v. Del Cid (Tampa, FL) Answer
and Counterclaims* Motion
for Extension of Time* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* Amended
Counterclaims* Decision
and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims as to Third
Counterclaim and Denying Motion as to First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and
Sixth Counterclaims* October
3, 2007, Notice of Settlement* UMG Recordings v. English
(Cleveland, OH) Complaint Answer UMG v. Greubel (Fort Worth, TX) Hard
drive protective order* Amended
complaint* Motion
to file reference list under seal* Answer
of Adam Greubel* Reply
memorandum in support of motion to appoint guardian ad litem for minor
child* Withdrawal
of motion to appoint guardian ad litem for minor child* Defendants'
report of settlement conference* Motion
to quash subpoena served upon defendants' father* Order
referring motion to quash to Magistrate Judge* Stipulation
of dismissal with prejudice UMG v. Guin (Brooklyn, NY) Answer
and Counterclaims in UMG v. Guin* UMG v. Heard (Birmingham,
Alabama) Defendant's
Request for Production of Documents* Defendant's
Interrogatories to Plaintiffs* Defendant's
Request for Admissions* UMG v. Hernandez (Brooklyn,
NY) Answer
and Counterclaims in UMG v. Hernandez* UMG v. Hightower (Houston,
TX) Defendant's
interrogatory answers* Defendant's
Response to Rule 34 Request* April
16, 2007, Motion to Quash Subpoena and Objections* Stipulation
of dismissal* Order
of dismissal* UMG v. Hummer Winblad
(San Francisco, CA)(Case Against Napster Investors) Memorandum
and Order, April 20, 2006, Denying Attorney Client Privilege Under
Crime/Fraud Exception* UMG v. Johnson (Kansas City,
KS) Amended
Answer and Counterclaims Plaintiffs'
brief in support of motion to dismiss counterclaims Defendant's
brief in response to motion to dismiss counterclaims UMG v. Landau (Utica, NY) Complaint* Answer* UMG Recordings v. Lanzoni
(Houston, TX) Complaint Pro
Se Answer Defendant's
document request Defendant's
interrogatories Defendant's
request for admissions Defendant's
expert witness report Defendant's
response to plaintiffs' interrogatories Defendant's
response to plaintiffs' document request Defendant's
Rule 11 motion Stipulation
of dismissal with prejudice UMG v. Lindor (Brooklyn, NY) Complaint* First
Amended Answer* February
2, 2006, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers to Hon. David G. Trager (re Request
for Pre-Motion Conference for Summary Judgment Motion) April
12, 2006, Expert Witness Report of Dr. Doug Jacobson* Marie
Lindor's Request for Pre-Motion Conference* RIAA
Response* Defendant's
Request for Documents* Defendant's
Interrogatories* Plaintiffs'
Response to Interrogatories and Document Request* Draft
Stipulation for Mirror Imaging Procedure* June
20, 2006, application to Magistrate Levy* RIAA
Response* Exhibit
A* Exhibit
B* RIAA
Motion to Compel* Supplement
Part 1* Supplement
Part 2* Supplement
Part 3* Beckerman
Reply to RIAA* Notice
of Motion to Amend Answer* Ty
Rogers Affidavit* Aram
Sinnreich Affidavit* Memorandum
of Law* RIAA
Memorandum in Opposition* Reply
Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion* Reply
Affidavit in Support of Defendant's Motion* Stipulation
regarding mirror imaging of hard drive* Order
of Magistrate Levy regarding hard drive mirror imaging and certain
other discovery matters* July
28, 2006, Letter of RIAA* July
28, 2006, Letter of Defendant* August
1, 2006, Letter of RIAA* August
1, 2006, Letter of Defendant (Preclusion as to song files plaintiffs
failed to produce)* August
4, 2006, Letter of RIAA (Preclusion)* August
4, 2006, Letter of Defendant (Preclusion)* Exhibit
- Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions, October 2005* Exhibit
- Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions, March
2006* August
6, 2006, Memo Endorsed Order of Magistrate Robert M. Levy* August
10, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy (Motion
to Compel Depositions of Plaintiffs)* August
14, 2006, Letter of Richard Gabriel to Magistrate Robert M. Levy* Exhibit
A* Exhibit
B* August
14, 2006, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers to Magistrate Robert M. Levy* Exhibit
A* August
25, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel, Asking to be in Room at Time of
Videoconference* August
25, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman in Opposition* August
25, 2006, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers, Requesting Permission to Proceed
with February 2, 2006, Summary Judgment Motion* August
28, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy (Re:
"Privilege" Assertion by RIAA as to Agreements with investigators)* August
28, 2006, Order of Hon. Robert M. Levy, Magistrate Judge* August
30, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman Requesting Pre-Motion Conference for
Summary Judgment Motion and Stay of Discovery During Pendency of Motion* February
2, 2006, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers Requesting Pre-Motion Conference
for Summary Judgment Motion* August
30, 2006, Letter of Richard Gabriel Opposing Request Pre-Motion
Conference for Summary Judgment Motion and Stay of Discovery During
Pendency of Motion, and Requesting Four (4) More Months of Discovery* Stipulation
Filed August 31, 2006, Concerning Confidentiality of Certain Documents* Transcript
of September 7, 2006, deposition of JoAn Cho* September
8, 2006, Letter to Magistrate* Document
Request Number 4* Response
to Document Request Number 4* Interrogatory
Number 5* Response
to Interrogatory Number 5* September
13, 2006, Letter of Richard Gabriel* Transcript
of September 7, 2006, Deposition of JoAn Cho, pages 1-3, 30-43* Notice
of Motion (Preclusion - Missing Song Files)* Affidavit
of Morlan Ty Rogers (Preclusion - Missing Song Files)* Opposition
Affidavit of Richard L. Gabriel (Preclusion - Missing Song Files)* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition (Preclusion - Missing Song Files)* Reply
Affidavit of Morlan Ty Rogers (Preclusion - Missing Song Files)* Reply
Memorandum of Law (Preclusion - Missing Song Files)* Exhibit
A (Preclusion - Missing Song Files) (Plaintiffs' Response to
Defendant's First Interrogatories)* Exhibit
B (Preclusion - Missing Song Files) (Plaintiffs' Response to
Defendant's Followup Interrogatories)* Notice
of Motion for Protective Order (MediaSentry agreements)* Memorandum
of Law* Declaration
of Richard Gabriel* Exhibit
D to Declaration of Richard Gabriel* Declaration
of Bradley Buckles* Declaration
of Ray Beckerman dated October 22, 2006, in opposition to RIAA motion
for protective order* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in opposition to RIAA motion for protective order* October
23, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Hard Drive Report)* Attachments
to October 23, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Hard Drive Report)* October
25, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (Hard Drive Report)* Attachment
to October 25 Letter of Richard M. Gabriel (Hard Drive Report)* November
2, 2006, Order of Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy, Denying Defendant's
Motion for Discovery Sanctions* November
9, 2006, Order Granting Leave to Amend Answer to Include
Unconstitutionality Defense* (Westlaw Cite: 2006 WL 3335048)Second
Amended Answer, Filed November 9, 2006* RIAA
Reply Declaration (MediaSentry protective order motion)* RIAA
Reply Memorandum (MediaSentry protective order motion)* November
21, 2006, Letter of Richard A. Altman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy
(Quash Subpoena)* Attachment
to Letter of Richard A. Altman (Subpoena)* Attachment
to Letter of Richard A. Altman (Objections to Subpoena)* November
22, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman Joining in Application of Woody
Raymond to Quash Subpoena* November
22, 2006, Order of Judge David G. Trager referring preclusion motion to
Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy* November
27, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* November
28, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Hard Drive Deposition Deadline)* Attachment
(Copy of August 3, 2006, Order)* November
28, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel Requesting Mutual Extension of
Discovery Cutoff* November
28, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman Responding to RIAA Request* November
29, 2006, Order Extending Discovery Cutoff to 60 Days After RIAA
Produces Hard Drive Report* November
30, 2006, Docket Entry, Oral Argument of MediaSentry protective order
motion, preclusion motion, and Ms. Lindor's son's objections to
subpoena* Transcript
of November 30, 2006, proceedings* December
12, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* Attachment
(Direct TV v. Trone, 209 F.R.D. 455, C. D. Cal. 2002)* December
12, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman* December
12, 2006, Report and Recommendation Denying in Part and Granting in
Part Defendant's Motion to Preclude (Preclusion - Missing Song Files)* Defendant's
Objection to Report and Recommendation* December
13, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Timetable for Production of
Wholesale Download Pricing Documents* December
14, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (Timetable for Production of
Wholesale Download Pricing Documents* December
15, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy* Expert
Witness Declaration in Foundation v. UPC Nederland* Court
Decision in Foundation v. UPC Nederland* December
18, 2006, Order of Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy (Re: Wholesale
pricing documents)* December
19, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* Exhibit
A -- portion of December 15, 2006, post from "Recording Industry vs.
The People"* December
19, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman* Exhibit
A -- July 13, 2006, Decision of Amsterdam Court of Appeal* Plaintiffs'
Motion to Compel* Richard
Gabriel Declaration in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel* Douglas
Jacobson Declaration in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel* December
22, 2006, Order and Decision Adopting Magistrate Judge's
Recommendations and Report concerning Defendant's preclusion motion* December
22, 2006, Notice of Deposition of Plaintiff's Expert Witness Dr. Doug
Jacobson and Request for Production of Documents* December
22, 2006, Letter of Richard A. Altman to Magistrate Judge Robert M.
Levy* December
26, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* December
26, 2006, Letter of Ray Beckerman Objecting to Use of Doug Jacobson
materials*
Declaration of Dr. Doug Jacobson* Curriculum
vitae* December
27, 2006, Letter of Richard A. Altman* December
27, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* Additional
December 27, 2006, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* December
28, 2006, Letter of Richard A. Altman* Supplemental
Request for Production of Documents to Dr. Doug Jacobson* January
2, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy, calling
attention of court to USA v. Ganier, 468 F. 3d 920 (6th Cir. Nov. 15,
2006) (MediaSentry protective order motion)* January
2, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Levy* Proposed
Order Governing Production of Wholesale Pricing Documents* January
3, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (Disclosure of Wholesale Download
Prices)* Exhibit
A to Letter of Richard L. Gabriel* January
3, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman responding to Gabriel letter
(Disclosure of Wholesale Download Prices)* Exhibit
A to Letter of Ray Beckerman* Exhibit
B to Letter of Ray Beckerman* Exhibit
C to Letter of Ray Beckerman* January
4, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel* January
4, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman* February
7, 2007, Declaration of Ray Beckerman* Exhibit
A (February 7, 2007, Order and Decision in Capitol Records v.
Debbie Foster )* February
15, 2007, Order Scheduling Oral Argument* February
16, 2007, Order of Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy denying defendant's
application for order compelling responses to Interrogatory 5 and
Document Request 4* Memorandum
of Law In Opposition to Motion to Compel* Declaration
of Richard A. Altman In Opposition to Motion to Compel* Affidavit
of Woody Raymond In Opposition to Motion to Compel* Transcript
of February 23, 2007, Deposition of RIAA Expert Witness, Dr. Doug
Jacobson, in UMG v. Lindor (Condensed format) Transcript
of February 23, 2007, Deposition: Excerpts relating to inability to
detect an individual Transcript
of February 23, 2007, Deposition: Excerpts relating to absence of
Daubert reliability factors Exhibit
1 (Press Release)* Exhibit
2 (Press Release 4/21/04)* Exhibit
3 (Article 4/19/04)* Exhibit
4 (Article 4/21/04)* Exhibit
5 (Article 3/3/04)* Exhibit
6 ("DownloadData" text file from MediaSentry)* Exhibit
7 ("Kazaa Overlay" Study by Ross, Kumar, and Liang)* Exhibit
8 (Diagram LAN router NAT)* Exhibit
9 (Pollution in P2P File Sharing Systems" Study by Ross, Kumar, Liang,
and Xi)* Exhibit
10 ("SystemLog" text file from MediaSentry)* Exhibit
11 ("UserLog" text file from MediaSentry)* Exhibit
12 (Screenshot from MediaSentry)* Exhibit
13 ("Traceroute" text file from MediaSentry)* Exhibit
14 ("UserLog (Compressed)" text file from MediaSentry)* Exhibit
15 (Unsigned undated October 25, 2006, draft report)* Exhibit
16 (April 7, 2006, report)* Exhibit
17 (Handwritten notes, page DJ0067)* Exhibit
18 (Handwritten notes on form)* Exhibit
19 (November 17, 2004, Letter of Patrick M. Flahterty, "Designated
Agent")* Exhibit
20 (Resume)* Exhibit
21 (Page from Encase web site)* Jacobson
2003 Senate Testimony (Used for Questioning but not marked as exhibit)* March
12, 2007, Letter from Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Robert M. Levy* Exhibit
A-Tom Mizzone declaration in Elektra v. Santangelo* Exhibit
B-Jacobson Deposition Exhibit 6* Exhibit
C-Jacobson Deposition Exhibit 10* Exhibit
D-Jacobson Deposition Exhibit 12 Pages 1-3* Exhibit
E-Jacobson Deposition Exhibit 13* Exhibit
F-Jacobson Deposition Exhibit 14* Exhibit
G-Jacoboson Deposition Exhibit 11 Pages 1-3* Exhibit
H-Oral Argument in Warner v. Does 1-149, Excerpt from Transcript* Exhibit
I-February 23, 2007, Deposition of Dr. Doug Jacobson, Excerpt of
Transcript* March
14, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (MediaSentry Protective Order
Motion)* March
27, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Magistrate Levy (Re Motion to
Compel Ms. Lindor's Son to Produce Computer)* March
27, 2007, Letter of Richard A. Altman to Magistrate Levy (Responding to
Richard L. Gabriel March 27th Letter)* March
30, 2007, Granting RIAA Motion for Protective Order* Defendant's
Notice of Objection to March 30, 2007, Granting RIAA Motion for
Protective Order Concerning MediaSentry agreements* March
30, 2007, Order Denying RIAA Motion to Compel* April
2, 2007, Letter of Richard Altman (Re: Attorneys Fees)* April
3, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel (Re: Attorneys Fees)* April
9, 2007, Objections of RIAA to March 30, 2007, Order, Denying Hard
Drive Production* April
9, 2007, Response of RIAA to Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Order
Granting MediaSentry Protective Order Motion* April
10, 2007, Order, Denying Woody Raymond Request for Attorneys Fees* Objections
to Magistrate's Order* April
20, 2007, Letter of Richard A. Altman Correcting Objections* April
26, 2007, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers to Magistrate Robert M. Levy
Requesting In Limine Exclusion of RIAA Expert witness Douglas Jacobson
trial testimony* Exhibit
T (Transcript of Deposition)(Part 1)* Exhibit
T (Transcript of Deposition)(Part 2)* Exhibit
R (Report of Expert)* Exhibit
H (November 30, 2006, Hearing Transcript)(Part 1)* Exhibit
H (November 30, 2006, Hearing Transcript)(Part 2)* Rule
37.3 Letter* May
14, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel, In Opposition to In Limine
Motion* Exhibit
A--May 14, 2007, declaration of Tom Mizzone* May
14, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman designation Prof. Johan Pouwelse as
Expert Witness* Curriculum
vitae of Prof. Johan Pouwelse* Stipulations
for Determination of Wholesale Download Prices* Order
approving stipulations* May
17,2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judges David G. Trager and Robert
M. Levy (In Limine Motion to Exclude Trial Testimony of RIAA expert)* May
18, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel* May
18, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman* May
23, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy
(Discovery on Copyright Misuse)* Exhibit
to Letter -- May 23, 2007, Order of Judge Charles L. Brieant in Lava v.
Amurao* Order
Re May 25, 2007, Telephone Status Conference* Order
entered May 25, 2007, Levy, M.J., Granting Leave to Serve Subpoena with
Alternate Means of Service* June
29, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel, Opposing Defendant's Request
for Discovery into Agreements among RIAA members* July
3, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman (Discovery into copyright misuse)* July
6th Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (Re: Copyright Misuse Discovery
Motion)* July
9th Letter of Ray Beckerman (Re: Copyright Misuse Discovery Motion)* July
1, 2007, Order of Magistrate Robert M. Levy Reserving Decision on
Motion to Compel Discovery* July
10, 2007, Letter of Richard Gabriel, Denominated a Contempt Motion* July
10, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman, Commenting on Richard L. Gabriel
Letter* July
11, 2007, Order of Magistrate Robert M. Levy Holding Contempt Motion in
Abeyance* July
10, 2007, Subpoena Duces Tecum from RIAA to Verizon Internet Services,
Inc. July
10, 2007, Subpoena Duces Tecum from RIAA to Verizon Internet Services,
Inc. August
8, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. David G. Trager (Motion
to Dismiss Copyright Misuse Defense)* August
15, 2007, Memo Endorsed Order Approving Briefing Schedule* RIAA
Motion to Strike 4th Affirmative Defense, Copyright Misuse* RIAA
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Strike 4th Affirmative
Defense, Copyright Misuse* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss
Copyright Misuse Affirmative Defense Plaintiffs'
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Strike Copyright Misuse
Defense* October
2, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (Re
Misstatements in Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Fourth Affirmative
Defense)* October
6, 2007, Letter Motion of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy for
order compelling response to Interrogatory dated July 11, 2007 (Re
Expenses Per Download)* October
8, 2007, Notice for Production of Documents (Transcripts of testimony)* October
11, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Robert M. Levy requesting
protective order re July 11, 2007, interrogatory requesting expense
information* October
12, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy opposing motion for
protective order and in further support of motion to compel response to
July 11, 2007, interrogatory requesting expense information* October
15, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. David G. Trager and Hon.
Robert M. Levy (Re Motion to Exclude Dr. Doug Jacobson)* October
15, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. David G. Trager and Hon.
Robert M. Levy (Re Motion to Exclude Dr. Doug Jacobson)* October
15, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Robert M. Levy (Further
Opposition to Motion to Compel Expense Discovery)* October
16, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (Responding to
RIAA's Further Opposition to Motion to Compel Expense Discovery)* October
17, 2007, Order of Hon. David G. Trager Affirming Orders of Hon. Robert
M. Levy* Motion
of Non-party Woody Raymond for Reconsideration* RIAA
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration* November
14, 2007, Subpoena to Safenet, Inc. ("MediaSentry") for Deposition and
for Production of Documents and Things* November
25, 2007, Order of Hon. Robert M. Levy, Directing Response to
Interrogatory and Telephone Deposition* November
30, 2007, Decision, Denying Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of
Plaintiffs' Expert and Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike
Affirmative Defense of Copyright Misuse* (531 F. Supp.2d 453)December
5, 2007, Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration* December
19, 2007, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (supplemental expert report)* Proposed
Supplemental Expert Report* December
19, 2007, Letter of Richard A. Altman in opposition* December
20, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman in opposition* January
16, 2008, Order directing production of external hard drive* MediaSentry
Subpoena Response Part I* MediaSentry
Subpoena Response Part II* February
19, 2008, Motion to Compel MediaSentry Document Subpoena Response* Exhibit
A to Motion to Compel MediaSentry Document Subpoena Response (Subpoena
sans exhibits)* Exhibit
B to Motion to Compel MediaSentry Document Subpoena Response (Response
sans declarations and affidavits responding to item 4)* February
13, 2008, Expert Witness Report of Prof. Johan Pouwelse* February
27, 2008, Letter of Thomas M. Mullaney to Hon. Robert M. Levy (opposing
motion to compel MediaSentry to answer subpoena)* February
27, 2008, Letter of Richard Gabriel to Hon. Robert M. Levy (opposing
motion to compel MediaSentry to answer subpoena)* March
3, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman responding to MediaSentry* Exhibit
A - Tom Mizzone declaration* Exhibit
B - Text documents (Part 1) Exhibit
B - Text documents (Part 2) Exhibit
C - List of backup materials requested* Exhibit
D - Confidentiality stipulation and emails* Exhibit
E - Tom Mullaney emails indicating no further documents would be
produced even with confidentiality stipulation* Exhibit
F - Reply brief of Oregon Attorney General in Arista v. Does 1-17* Exhibit
G - RIAA surreply brief in Arista v. Does 1-17* Exhibit
H - RIAA opposition brief in Arista v. Does 1-21* March
3, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman responding to RIAA* Exhibit
I - Motion to compel production of MediaSentry agreements and March 30,
2007, order denying motion* Exhibit
J - Email exchange stating that MediaSentry was not being requested to
turn over its agreements with RIAA* March
21, 2008, letter motion of Ray Beckerman to quash subpoenas for
Illinois and Connecticut depositions* Exhibit
A - Deposition notices and subpoenas* Exhibit
B - Email exchange between Richard L. Gabriel and Ray Beckerman* Confidentiality
stipulation for SONY BMG royalty reports* Exhibit
A to confidentiality stipulation for SONY BMG royalty reports* April
9, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (re MediaSentry
cease and desist order)* Exhibit
A, January 2, 2008, cease and desist order issued by Massachusetts
State Police* April
9, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (surreply opposing motion to
compel subpeona response from MediaSentry)* April
7, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (8 discovery
issues)* April
9, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (8 discovery issues)* Exhibit
A (email string)* April
9, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (8 discovery
issues)* Exhibit
A (4 email strings)* April
10, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Robert M. Levy (8
discovery issues)* Exhibit
A (email string)* March
26, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Robert M. Levy (new 3d
party discovery)* March
26, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (new 3d party
discovery)* April
15, 2008, Order denying motion to quash and for protective order (new
3d party discovery)* April
17, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel to Hon. Robert M. Levy (re
Massachusetts cease and desist order)* April
17, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (re
Massachusetts cease and desist order)* Exhibit
A- printout from LaFace v. Does 1-17, showing capture dates after date
of cease and desist order)* May
2, 2008, Order resolving discovery issues* May
16, 2008, preliminary order of Hon. Robert M. Levy, Magistrate Judge,
granting MediaSentry motion to quash and RIAA motion for protective
order* Letter
of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (reconsideration of May 16th
order denying motion to compel MediaSentry response)* Exhibit
A -- May 16th order* Exhibit
B -- November 14, 2007, Subpoena* Exhibit
C -- May 13, 2007, article from Chronicle of Higher Education* Exhibit
D -- May, 2007, declaration of Tom Mizzone* Letter
of Victor B. Kao to Hon. Robert M. Levy* June
16, 2008, Letter of Thomas M. Mullaney to Hon. Robert M. Levy June
17, 2008, Letter of Eve G. Burton to Hon. Robert M. Levy July
4, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (re plaintiffs'
motion for dismissal without prejudice, 'discovery sanctions', and a
stay Exhibt
A-Jacobson testimony Exhibit
B-Capitol v. Foster Exhibit
C-Atlantic v. Andersen Excerpts
from 3 documents in UMG v. Lindor denying that MediaSentry relied on
its technical expertise, contradicting representations made by
MediaSentry in Kruger v. MediaSentry Plaintiffs'
memorandum of law in support of motion for voluntary dismissal without
prejudice Exhibits
A to I Exhibits
J to Q Exhibits
R to V Declaration
of Ray Beckerman in opposition Memorandum
of law in opposition Exhibit
A-Jacobson testimony Exhibit
B-Marie Lindor testimony pp 30-36 Exhibit
C-Marie Lindor testimony p 24 Exhibit
D-Marie Lindor testimony p 27 Exhibit
E-June 20, 2006 Email Ray Beckerman to Richard L. Gabriel (Hard Drive) Exhibit
F-Draft stipulation (Hard Drive) Exhibit
G-Defendant's application to Magistrate Judge Levy for Discovery
Rulings(Hard Drive)(Plaintiffs' Defaults) Exhibit
H-August 3, 2006, reflecting July 25, 2006, discovery rulings Exhibit
I-Timothy M. Reynolds email refusing to provide copy of transcript Exhibit
J-Letter in which Richard L. Gabriel admits that he called Mr.
Raymond's employers Exhibit
K-Defendant's objection to Gustave Lindor motion as "fishing expedition" Exhibit
L-Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy responding to RIAA cross-motion Exhibit
M-May 9, 2006, RIAA Email transmitting first draft of Hard Drive
stipulation Exhibit
N-April 7, 2006, RIAA Email apologizing for delay in responding re Hard
Drive inspection Exhibit
0-December 20, 2007, objection by defendant to RIAA expert submitting
5th version of report containing new matter Exhibit
P-Errata Sheet accompanying deposition transcript of Yannick
Raymond-Wright Exhibit
Q-Ars Technica eye witness report of RIAA lawyers consulting "Recording
Industry vs. The People during Capitol Records v. Thomas trial Exhibit
R-Kent State University Student Legal Services Office site Exhibit
S-Digital Music Law Class at University of Ottawa School of Law,
Professor DeBeer lesson plan Exhibit
T-Beckerman, Ray, "Large Recording Companies vs. The Defenseless: Some
Common Sense Solutions to the Challenges of the RIAA Litigations", The
Judges' Journal , Summer 2008 (American Bar Association--Judicial
Section) Exhibit
U-Reynolds, Daniel, Note, "The RIAA Litigation War on File Sharing and
Alternatives More Compatible with Public Morality", 9. Minn. J. L. Sci.
Tech 977 (2008) Exhibit
V-MediaSentry inconsistent statements Exhibit
W-December 12, 2006, decision of Hon. Robert M. Levy, granting
preclusion as to song files not produced in discovery, denying
preclusion of proof by alternative means Notice
of motion and declaration Supplemental
declaration November
18, 2008, letter of Eve G. Burton to Hon. Robert M. Levy November
18, 2008, letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy Plaintiffs'
reply memorandum Plaintiffs'
memorandum in opposition to Rule 11 motion Reply
Declaration of Ray Beckerman December
24, 2008, Order Referring Motions to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy Declaration
in Support of Substitution of Counsel Decision
of Magistrate Judge denying plaintiffs' motion for discovery sanctions,
granting plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice Memorandum
and Order Dismissing Case, Denying Sanctions Motion February
25, 2010, letter of Ray Beckerman to District Judge Hon. David G. Trager Order
precluding attorneys fees UMG Recordings v. Roy (New
Hampshire) Defendant's
Expert Witness Report UMG Recordings v. Veoh Networks
(Los Angeles, CA) December
29, 2008, Decision Denying Plaintiffs' Summary Judgment Motion February
2, 2009, Decision, Granting Investor Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
Amended Complaint September 11, 2009, District Court decision Ninth Circuit Decision Affirming District Court granting
of defendants' motion for summary judgment March
14, 2013, Decision granting rehearing and upon rehearing adhering to
original decision, US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Universal v. Hogan (San
Diego, CA)(MPAA case) Cover
Sheet, Summons, and Complaint* Answer* Case
Management Order* Case
Management Joint Report* Motion
to dismiss complaint* Declaration
of Seyamack Kouretchian in Support of Motion to dismiss complaint* Opposition
Memorandum* Opposition
Declaration of Thorland* Opposition
Declaration of Villalobos* Reply
Memorandum* December
11, 2006, Order Denying Motion to Dismiss* Joint
Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice Viacaom v. YouTube (New
York, NY) Order
and opinion denying plaintiffs the right to allege punitive damages in
addition to statutory damages* Amended
complaint* Answer
to amended complaint* July
2, 2008, Decision ruling on discovery issues April
5, 2012, decision of US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit Defendant's
memorandum of law in supuport of motion for summary judgment Plaintiffs'
opposition memorandum Defendant's
reply memorandum April
18, 2013, Opinion Granting Summary Judgment to Defendant After Remand,
Hon. Louis L. Stanton Virgin v. Does 1-33
(Knoxville, TN) Motion
to Quash* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Quash* Order
denying motion to quash subpoena (Alternate
link)* Virgin v. Marson (Central
Dist. California, Western Divis.) Stipulation
and Order of Dismissal* Virgin v. Morgan (Pensacola,
FL) Complaint
in Virgin v. Morgan, 3:06-cv-342 (N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division)* Answer*
Virgin v. Thomas (renamed
Capitol v. Thomas)(Duluth, MN) A partial docket sheet and set of docketed litigation
documents for this case is being hosted at the Justia.com legal
research web site. Additionally, the following documents are also
available at the links provided:RIAA
Memorandum in Support of Motion for summary adjudication* Defendant's
Memorandum in Opposition to RIAA Memorandum in Support of Motion for
summary adjudication* Order
Setting October 2nd as date certain for trial* Plaintiffs'
Statement of the Case* Defendant's
Statement of the Case* Plaintiffs'
Witness List* Order
Denying RIAA Motion for "Summary Adjudication"* Defendant's
In Limine Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Exhibit 4 (Copyright chain of
title documents)* October
1, 2007, Granting Defendant's In Limine Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs'
Exhibit 4 (Copyright chain of title documents)* Transcript,
October 2, 2007, pp. 1-278 Transcript,
October 3, 2007, pp. 280-543 Transcript,
October 4, 2007, pp. 544-643 Exhibit
6 (alleged screen shot) Exhibit
7 ("system log") Exhibit
8 ("user log" compressed) Exhibit
9 ("user log") Exhibit
10 ("download data") Exhibit
11 ("trace route") Exhibit
13 ("IM Log") Jacobson
report Special
Verdict Form Jury
Instructions Motion
to Set Aside Verdict* Motion
to Set Aside Verdict* RIAA
Opposition to Motion to Set Aside Verdict* Reply
Memorandum* U.S.A.
Memorandum in Defense of Constitutionality of Verdict* May
15, 2008, suggesting possible manifest error of law and calling for
briefs and oral argument* May
20, 2008, Order enlarging time periods for briefing schedule* May
20, 2008, Order establishing procedures and schedule for briefing by amicus
curiae * June
6, 2008, Order extending briefing schedule* Amicus
brief of Thomas D. Sydnor II of Progress & Freedom Association Amicus
brief of Motion Picture Association of America Amicus
brief of 10 copyright law professors Amicus
brief of Intellectual Property Institute of William Mitchell College of
Law Amicus
curiae brief of Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge, US
Internet Industry Association, and Computer & Communications
Industry Association Notice
of appearance of ten copyright law professors Defendant's
brief in support of new trial Plaintiffs'
brief opposing new trial Notice
from US DOJ that it takes no position May
15, 2008, Order indicating possible manifest error of law September
27, 2007, Order Granting Reconsideration and Vacating August 20, 2007,
Order in Atlantic v. Howell Plaintiffs'
Reply Brief Defendant's
Reply Brief Verrilli
pro hac vice motion August
4, 2008, minute entry September
24, 2008, decision setting aside verdict Memorandum
in support of motion for permission to appeal Notice
of Trial Defendant's
memorandum of law in opposition Plaintiffs'
Reply Memorandum December
23, 2008, Decision of Hon. Michael J. Davis, denying RIAA motion to
certification of interlocutory appeal Memorandum
in Support of Motion for Extension of Discovery Deadline RIAA
Opposition to Motion for Extension of time to enable retention of
expert by defendant Motion
for Continuance February
9, 2009, Order, Adjourning Trial to May 11, 2009, and Scheduling
Settlement Conference for March 30-31, 2009 February
12, 2009, Decision Granting Extension of Expert Discovery Deadline Plaintiffs'
motion to adjourn trial Order
granting plaintiffs' motion for adjournment of trial from May 11 to
June 15 Defendant's
motion to enlarge time from 7 days to 21 days for filing of expert's
report Plaintiffs'
opposition to defendant's motion to enlarge time from 7 days to 21 days
for filing of expert's report February
25, 2009, Notice of Settlement Conference Expert
Witness Report of Prof. Yongdae Kim Notice
of May 12th Settlement Conference Notice
of June 15th Trial Motion
for Substitution Camara
Declaration Blanchfield
Declaration Order
granting motion to substitute attorneys Amended
notice of trial Scheduling
order Order
permitting change of defendant's name in caption Memorandum
of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Suppress All MediaSentry
Evidence Blanchfield
affidavit in support of defendant's motion to suppress MediaSentry
material Defendant's
statement of case Plaintiffs'
exhibit list Plaintiffs'
in limine motion to exclude Prof. Kim Stipulation
of uncontested facts Plaintiffs'
in limine motion to preclude fair use defense Plaintiffs'
in limine motion to preclude innocent infringement defense Plaintiffs'
in limine motion to exclude evidence of other lawsuits Plaintiffs'
Proposed Jury Instructions Plaintiffs'
motion to preclude defendants from making objections at trial Plaintiffs'
opposition to defendant's motion to suppress MediaSentry materials Notice
of hearing scheduling plaintiffs' motion to preclude objections Defendants'
response to plaintiffs' motion to foreclose fair use defense Defendant's
response to plaintiffs' motion to preclude reference to cases Defendant's
response to plaintiffs' motion to exclude defendant's expert witness's
testimony Defendant's
response to plaintiff's motion to bar her from making objections Order
denying RIAA motion to bar defendant from making evidentiary objections
to copyright registrations June
11, 2009, Decision Ruling on On Limine Motions Defendant's
Objections to Plaintiffs' Proposed Exhibits Plaintiffs'
exhibit list Plaintiffs'
amended exhibit list filed June 12, 2009 Special
Order that names & addresses of jurors and prospective jurors shall
not be released Defendant's
memorandum in support of objection to uncertified sound recordings Defendant's
memorandum in support of objection to exhibit 4 Plaintiffs'
memorandum in opposition to objection to registration documents Plaintiffs'
brief opposing objection to uncertified sound recordings June
16, 2009, Order, sustaining objection to registration documents,
overruling objection to uncertain sound recordings and parol evidence Plaintiffs'
brief opposing objection to uncertified sound recordings June
16, 2009, Order, sustaining objection to registration documents,
overruling objection to uncertain sound recordings and parol evidence Jury
Instructions Special
verdict form Completed
special verdict form Order
allowing attorneys to contact jurors Plaintiffs'
motion to amend judgment
Defendant's
motion for new trial Court's
notice of briefing schedule Court's
notice of briefing schedule Plaintiffs'
motion for extension of time Order
extending time Plaintiffs'
Opposition Memorandum DOJ
Opposition Memorandum Defendant's
Opposition Memorandum Defendant's
reply brief in support of motion to set aside verdict Plaintiffs'
reply brief in support of motion to amend judgment Decision
granting remittitur Notice
of election for new trial Notice
of Trial Date Joint
Motion for Relief from order directing settlement mediation under
Special Master Order
setting November 1st trial date October
13, 2010, Decision Court's
proposed jury instructions Defendant's
motion for reconsideration October
13, 2010, Decision Court's
proposed jury instructions Defendant's
motion for reconsideration Department
of Justice Opposition Papers RIAA
Opposition Papers October
22, Decision, Denying Reconsideration, Declining to Rule on
Constitutional Issue Court
minutes Verdict Amicus
reply brief Defendant's
motion to reduce judgment RIAA's
opposition brief Department
of Justice's opposition brief July
22, 2011, decision RIAA
notice of appeal RIAA
brief Amicus
brief of EFF, Public Knowledge, et al MPAA Amicus brief DOJ
Appellee Brief Thomas-Rasset
Reply Brief Notice of
arguments Audiotape
of June 12, 2012, argument in US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit Decision
of US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit Petition
for certiorari Petitioner's
Reply Brief RIAA
Brief In Opposition to Certiorari US
Supreme Court order list, March 18, 2013
Virgin v. Thompson (W.D.
TX) January
4, 2008, order of affirmance* Petition
for certiorari* Virgin Records v. Young
(Brooklyn, NY) Motion
to Vacate Default Judgment Docket
sheet Voltage Pictures v. Does
1-198 (Portland, OR) Order
to show cause why cases should not be severed, April 10, 2013, Hon. Ann
Aiken, District Judge May
4, 2013, Order, Hon. Ann Aiken, District Judge Warner v. Attal (Brooklyn, NY) Answer
and Counterclaims in Warner v. Attal* December
12, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida to Judge Trager requesting permission
for late filing of motions* December
12, 2007, Letter of Jaime Lathrop to Judge Trager opposing RIAA request
for permission for late filing of motions* December
13, 2007, Letter of Richard Guida to Hon. David G. Trager* December
21, 2007, Letter of Jaime Lathrop to Hon. David G. Trager (re RIAA
request for permission for late filing of motion to dismiss
counterclaims)* Warner v. Berry (New York, NY) Opinion
and Order denying default judgment* (2008 WL 1320969)Warner v. Cassin (White
Plains, NY) June
2, 2006, Letter of attorneys for defendant* June
8, 2006, Letter of attorneys for plaintiffs* June
9, 2006, Letter of attorneys for defendant* November
20, 2006, Order, Scheduling Pre-Motion Conference for February 2, 2007* January
31, 2007, Order re-scheduling conference to April 27th* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* June
29, 2007, Transcript of proceedings before Judge Stephen C. Robinson
(Pre-motion Conference)* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Defendant's
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint* Motion
for Leave to file Sur-Reply Brief* Proposed
Surreply Brief* August
22, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman opposing Motion for Leave to file
Sur-Reply Brief* August
22, 2007, Letter of Brian E. Moran in Warner v. Cassin
Transmitting Atlantic v. Howell * August
24, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman Responding to Moran Letter* August
28, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Judge Robinson in Warner v. Cassin
(Latin American Music decision)* September
12, 2007, Letter of Brian E. Moran to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson* Memo
Endorsed Order Granting RIAA Permission to File Sur-reply Brief* September
18, 2007, Letter of Timothy M. Reynolds to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson October
4, 2007, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers (Submitting Copy of September 27,
2007, order in Atlantic v. Howell)* November
1, 2007, Letter of Timothy Reynolds to Hon. Stephen M. Robinson* November
2, 2007, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen M. Robinson* February
25, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson in Warner
v. Cassin* February
28, 2008, Letter of Brian E. Moran to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson in
Warner v. Cassin* March
17, 2007, letter of Victor B. Kao to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Asking
judge to lift stay of discovery in Warner v. Cassin) April
2, 2008, letter of Victor B. Kao to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Re
Elektra v. Barker 3/31/08 decision)* April
2, 2008, letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Re
Elektra v. Barker 3/31/08 decision)* April
21, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson* April
29, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robertson (copy of
Atlantic v. Howell April 29th decision)* May
15, 2008, letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon Stephen C. Robinson (re
Capitol v. Thomas and Atlantic v. Howell)* Notice
of dismissal, so ordered June 4, 2008* Complaint,
Warner v. Does 1-4 Motion
for discovery Declaration
of Laurie Rust Declaration
of Carlos Linares Ex
parte orders from other cases June
12, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (re
recall of previous order) June
12, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Charles L. Brieant (re
referral of related case) June
12, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (re
letter to Judge Brieant) June
16, 2008, Letter of Victor B. Kao to Hon. Charles L. Brieant June
16, 2008, Letter of Timothy Reynolds to Hon. Stephen C. Robinson Notice
of motion by Joan Cassin to designate case as related to Warner v.
Cassin August
25, 2008, Order ruling that no discovery schedule will be set at this
time Notice
of dismissal without prejudice Warner v. DeWitt (N.D.
Illinois, Eastern Div.) Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Vacate Default* RIAA's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Vacate Default* Defendant's
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Vacate Default* February
28, 2007, Order Vacating Default Judgment* Warner v. Doe (Raleigh, NC) Warner
v. Doe Motion to Dismiss, Strike, and Quash* Brief* Robertson
Affidavit with Exhibit, May 14, 2008, Informal Opinion of North
Carolina Private Protective Services Board* Proposed
Stay Order* Warner v. Does 1-149 (New
York, NY) Complaint.* Ex
Parte Order.* Second
Ex Parte Order.* John
Does' Notice of Motion* Affidavit
of Morlan Ty Rogers in Support of Motion* Affidavit
of Zi Mei in Support of Motion* Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion* Memorandum
of Law in Opposition* March
31, 2006, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers Requesting Stay* March
31, 2006, Letter of J. Christopher Jensen Opposing Stay as to Other 147
Defendants* Reply
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion* Transcript
of oral argument of John Does' motion to (a) vacate ex parte discovery
order, (b) quash subpoena, and (c) sever and dismiss as to John Does
2-149* Order
Denying John Does' Motion to Vacate Ex Parte Discovery Order, Quash
Subpoena, and Sever and Dismiss as to John Does 2-149* Warner v. Lewis (Lafayette,
LA) December
14, 2007, Order Setting February 14, 2008, default judgment hearing* RIAA's
January 25, 2008, Ex Parte Motion to Vacate Hearing* January
28, 2008, Order Denying RIAA Motion* February
27, 2008, Motion to Substitute New Counsel for RIAA Plaintiffs* Hearing
Outline* March
11, 2008, default judgment* Warner v. Maravilla Motion
to dismiss complaint* Defendant's
Request for Judicial Notice* Plaintiffs'
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal* Warner v. Paladuk (Eastern
District, Michigan)* Summons
in Warner v. Paladuk* Warner v. Payne (Waco,
Texas)* (Also published at 2006 WL 2844415) Order
denying motion to dismiss complaint* Warner Bros. Entertainment v.
RDR Books (New York, NY) September
8, 2008, Decision Warner v. Scantlebury
(E.D. Michigan, Southern Division) Motion
for Stay and Extension of "Deadlines" to Allow Deceased Defendant's
Children 60 Days to "Grieve" Before RIAA Starts Taking Childrens'
Depositions* Warner v. Stubbs (Oklahoma
City, OK) Answer
and Counterclaim* Plaintiffs'
Motion to Dismiss* "Errata"
Correcting RIAA's Motion to Dismiss* Order
permitting correction October
1, 2006, Defendant's Objection to Plaintiffs' Reply* October
10, 2006, Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Objection* October
24, 2006, Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Response* March
13, 2007, Order, Granting So Much of Plaintiffs' Motion as Sought
Dismissal of Their Complaint Without Prejudice, Denying So Much of
Plaintiff's Motion as Sought Dismissal of Defendant's Counterclaim for
a Declaratory Judgment* Motion
for extension of time to file reply to counterclaims* RIAA
Renewal Motion Containing Covenant Not to Sue and Asking for Dismissal
of Counterclaims* Defendant's
Objections to Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims* July
2, 2007, Order Dismissing Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment* Defendant's
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Attorneys Fees* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion for Attorneys Fees* Defendant's
Motion for Leave to Reply, in Support of Motion for Attorneys Fees* Reply
Brief in Support of Attorneys Fees Motion* Declaration
of Expert Witness Jayson Street* March
5, 2008, Order, Denying Defendant's Motion for Attorneys Fees* Notice
of Appeal* US
Court of Appeals docketing statement* Warner Bros. Records v.
Weiner (Boston, MA) Pro
se defendant's motion to dismiss complaint Notice
of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice WNET v. Aereo (New York, NY) Complaint Opinion
of US Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit affirming denial of preliminary
injunction Defendants'
memorandum of law in support of motion for summary judgment WPIX v. ivi (US Ct App 2nd
Circuit) August
27, 2012, decision of US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit Zomba v. Does 1-11 (Boston,
MA) July
28, 2008, Report of Tufts University to Hon. Nancy Gertner Zomba v. Does 1-15
(Kentucky) Memorandum
of Law in support of motion to quash Affidavit
in support of motion to quash Order
denying motion to quash